Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 21, 2021 at 12:26 comment added yimin In Chapter 1, they assume the boundary to be smooth, but from the descriptions at the beginning of Chapter 8, the model of the boundary containing a smooth submanifold, at the point of the submanifold, has a neighborhood diffeomorphic to a production of a cone with a Euclidean space, which seems to match with my model
Aug 21, 2021 at 8:50 comment added Daniele Tampieri Be careful, since Nazarov and Plamenevsky consider "smooth $=C^\infty$" (op. cit. chapter 1, §1.1 p. 4, where they give a brief description of the notation). The reason for developing the theory assuming $\partial\Omega\in C^2$ or at least a to be a Lyapunov manifold ($C^{1,\alpha}$, $0<\alpha\le 1$) is possibly due to the fact that you have at least an "estimate" on the direction of the outer normal to $\partial\Omega$. However, Nazarov and Plamenevsky's monograph is a nice work, so have an app reading experience. :)
Aug 20, 2021 at 13:55 comment added yimin I guess I have found the answer in a book named"Elliptic Problems in Domains with Piecewise Smooth Boundaries" written by Sergey A. Nazarov, Boris A. Plamenevsky for my question. The boundary model in Chapter 8 is exactly the case I need.
Aug 20, 2021 at 5:17 comment added yimin But we don't have a boundary even better than $C^1$. (while the non-smooth part measures zero.)
Aug 20, 2021 at 4:36 comment added Daniele Tampieri For the standard smooth case this Q&A is relevant: the piecewise smooth boundary case seems to be tractable with the same techniques used for the globally smooth (read $\partial\Omega\in C^{k+2}$, $k\in\Bbb N$ case).
Aug 20, 2021 at 4:32 history edited Daniele Tampieri CC BY-SA 4.0
Minor grammar improvements and formatting
Aug 20, 2021 at 4:05 review First posts
Aug 20, 2021 at 6:05
Aug 20, 2021 at 4:01 history asked yimin CC BY-SA 4.0