Timeline for Question on a constructive proof that space projective curves are the intersections of three hypersurfaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2021 at 15:25 | comment | added | LSpice | I edited to fix some typos and link to @abx's comment and the answer I think you wanted. Since "the first answer" is not well defined over time, I looked for one that seemed to fit your description, and the accepted answer does, so I linked to that. I apologise if it was not correct. In the meantime, I took @user347489's suggestion and moved the disclaimer to the front. | |
| Oct 9, 2021 at 15:23 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Proofreading; link to comment and answer; moved edit
|
| Aug 22, 2021 at 7:34 | comment | added | user347489 | It'd be nice if the edit was a disclaimer before the main text instead of at the very end. | |
| Aug 21, 2021 at 20:44 | history | edited | Libli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edit added following comments below tbe answer.
|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 16:10 | comment | added | Libli | @abx : right, stupid mistake. Thanks for the comment. It seems I need a fourth hypersurface to get rid off the residual points of intersection. I will edit. | |
| Aug 16, 2021 at 7:40 | comment | added | abx | Why is it sufficient to prove that your general surface in $|\mathscr{I}(d_2)|$ doesn't contain $\mathscr{C}_i$? It could intersect $\mathscr{C}_i$ in a point not contained in $\mathscr{C}$. | |
| Aug 16, 2021 at 6:48 | history | edited | Libli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fix some indexes typos and spelling mistakes
|
| Aug 15, 2021 at 8:30 | history | answered | Libli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |