Timeline for Question concerning an inequality on probabilities of hitting times in a paper
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2021 at 13:47 | comment | added | user128095 | All right. Thanks anyway. I will change the title of this question as it is not related to Fatou's lemma | |
| Aug 6, 2021 at 13:46 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @Neymar : I saw that question, but don't have good ideas about it. | |
| Aug 6, 2021 at 13:43 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 6, 2021 at 13:43 | comment | added | user128095 | Thanks again for your help. If you don't mind, may I ask you to take a look at my question arising in previous post mathoverflow.net/questions/398321/… ? | |
| Aug 6, 2021 at 13:41 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @Neymar : Thank you for your comments. I have fixed the typos. | |
| Aug 6, 2021 at 13:37 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2021 at 12:32 | comment | added | user128095 | In the first case, it should be $t_n\in [s_n,s_*)$ instead of $t_n\in (s_n,s_*)$; In the second case, it should be $l_n(t)\to l(t)$ instead of $l_n(t)=l(t)$. Could you have a check such that I accept your solution? | |
| Aug 6, 2021 at 12:30 | comment | added | user128095 | Thank you very kindly for your answer. This is not the first time that I get help from your behalf. Thanks a lot! I think there are two typos in your arguments: | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 17:49 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |