Timeline for Vanishing rate of a harmonic function near a boundary point
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2021 at 8:15 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | In Europe we usually call that way the prism shaped tent | |
| Aug 6, 2021 at 3:51 | history | edited | Jacob Lu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 272 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2021 at 20:40 | comment | added | Tavian Barnes | @PietroMajer As a Canadian, what is a Canadian tent? | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 18:15 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Aug 5, 2021 at 15:21 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | I just misses to see the condition on $u_y$ .. | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 14:28 | answer | added | Connor Mooney | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 13:54 | answer | added | Mateusz Kwaśnicki | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 13:47 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | You should add some conditions, explaining what $u(x,0)$ and $u_y(x,0)$ exactly are. Your function is defined only in the upper half-plane. Is it assumed to be continuous in the closed half-plane? $u_y$ is continuous in the closed half-plane? What about $u_x$? | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 12:26 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | The physical intuition already suggests it can't be true. Imagine a soap film bounded by circular wire of radius 1, with an obstacle in the middle, given by a unit wire straight segment, located at some distance from the disk on a plane parallel to it. We expect the shape of the film not to be smooth near the segment, but more similar to a Canadian tent. | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 12:17 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | (I think you mean "the upper half-plane $\mathbb R\times \mathbb R_+$" ) | |
| Aug 5, 2021 at 10:14 | history | asked | Jacob Lu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |