Skip to main content

Timeline for Morita equivalence of Lie groupoids

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 11, 2022 at 19:56 comment added Žan Grad Oh, I think I see why: $\mathcal F|_{\mathrm{Hom}(h,k)}$ maps $\mathrm{Hom}(h,k)$ diffeomorphically onto $\mathcal H\times_{\mathcal G_0\times \mathcal G_0} \{(h,k)\}$ and the latter is identified with $\mathrm{Hom}(\phi(h),\phi(k))$.
Dec 11, 2022 at 19:47 comment added Žan Grad @AdittyaChaudhuri Could you please elaborate on why $\mathrm{pr}_1\circ\mathcal F|_{\mathrm{Hom}(h,k)}$ should be a diffeomorphism?
Feb 17, 2022 at 15:03 comment added Adittya Chaudhuri @LSpice Yh it's fine.
Jan 28, 2022 at 21:43 comment added LSpice I did a spot of proofreading, and, while I was editing, noticed that all $\phi$s were \mathcald. Since this makes no difference (see $\phi$ \phi vs. $\mathcal{\phi}$ \mathcal{\phi}), I removed it, hopefully doing no harm to your intention.
Jan 28, 2022 at 21:42 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Proofreading and TeX (`\mathcal\phi`?) while the question is bumped to the front page
Aug 1, 2021 at 17:56 history answered Adittya Chaudhuri CC BY-SA 4.0