Timeline for Morita equivalence of Lie groupoids
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 11, 2022 at 19:56 | comment | added | Žan Grad | Oh, I think I see why: $\mathcal F|_{\mathrm{Hom}(h,k)}$ maps $\mathrm{Hom}(h,k)$ diffeomorphically onto $\mathcal H\times_{\mathcal G_0\times \mathcal G_0} \{(h,k)\}$ and the latter is identified with $\mathrm{Hom}(\phi(h),\phi(k))$. | |
Dec 11, 2022 at 19:47 | comment | added | Žan Grad | @AdittyaChaudhuri Could you please elaborate on why $\mathrm{pr}_1\circ\mathcal F|_{\mathrm{Hom}(h,k)}$ should be a diffeomorphism? | |
Feb 17, 2022 at 15:03 | comment | added | Adittya Chaudhuri | @LSpice Yh it's fine. | |
Jan 28, 2022 at 21:43 | comment | added | LSpice |
I did a spot of proofreading, and, while I was editing, noticed that all $\phi$s were \mathcal d. Since this makes no difference (see $\phi$ \phi vs. $\mathcal{\phi}$ \mathcal{\phi} ), I removed it, hopefully doing no harm to your intention.
|
|
Jan 28, 2022 at 21:42 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Proofreading and TeX (`\mathcal\phi`?) while the question is bumped to the front page
|
Aug 1, 2021 at 17:56 | history | answered | Adittya Chaudhuri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |