Skip to main content
added 15 characters in body
Source Link
Francesco Polizzi
  • 66.3k
  • 5
  • 180
  • 283

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite-dimensional?

Question. Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from $V$ to $V^{**}$ is surjective if $V$ is finite-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly picking a basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously gentlemanly.

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly picking a basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously gentlemanly.

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Question. Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from $V$ to $V^{**}$ is surjective if $V$ is finite-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly picking a basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously gentlemanly.

corrected spelling (unambiguously), typo (dimensional) etc.
Source Link
Dag Oskar Madsen
  • 3.7k
  • 3
  • 28
  • 51

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly picking a basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously gentlemanly.

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly picking basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously gentlemanly.

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly picking a basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously gentlemanly.

corrected spelling (unambiguously), typo (dimensional) etc.
Source Link

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite dimensionsal-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly pickpicking basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambigouslyunambiguously gentlemanly.

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite dimensionsal?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly pick basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambigously gentlemanly.

Around these parts, the aphorism "A gentleman never chooses a basis," has become popular.

Is there a gentlemanly way to prove that the natural map from V to V** is surjective if V is finite-dimensional?

As in life, the exact standards for gentlemanliness are a bit vague. Some arguments seem to be implicitly picking basis. I'm hoping there's an argument which is unambiguously gentlemanly.

Question Protected by CommunityBot
Rollback to Revision 2
Source Link
Richard Dore
  • 5.3k
  • 6
  • 36
  • 43
Loading
unloaded language
Source Link
S. Carnahan
  • 45.7k
  • 6
  • 114
  • 220
Loading
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Richard Dore
  • 5.3k
  • 6
  • 36
  • 43
Loading
Source Link
Richard Dore
  • 5.3k
  • 6
  • 36
  • 43
Loading