Timeline for Distinguishing pro-finite completions
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2010 at 5:22 | vote | accept | Mustafa Gokhan Benli | ||
| Sep 26, 2010 at 5:22 | |||||
| Sep 26, 2010 at 5:22 | vote | accept | Mustafa Gokhan Benli | ||
| Sep 26, 2010 at 5:22 | |||||
| Sep 26, 2010 at 1:51 | comment | added | Simon Thomas | @Mark: Many thanks ... that was the answer that I was hoping for! | |
| Sep 26, 2010 at 0:02 | comment | added | user6976 | @Simon: See Pyber, László Groups of intermediate subgroup growth and a problem of Grothendieck. Duke Math. J. 121 (2004), no. 1, 169--188. | |
| Sep 25, 2010 at 22:47 | comment | added | Simon Thomas | Does this narrow things down sufficiently that for each finitely generated residually finite group $G$, there are only countably many finitely generated residually finite groups $H$ with an isomorphic profinite completion? Or is this obviously false? | |
| Sep 25, 2010 at 22:21 | history | answered | Jim Belk | CC BY-SA 2.5 |