Timeline for Is symplectic reduction interesting from a physical point of view?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019 at 0:01 | answer | added | Rock Brentwood | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 5, 2011 at 15:14 | answer | added | DamienC | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 30, 2010 at 22:59 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | @student: the standard model of particle physics is a quantum gauge theory with lots of experimental support and it's not just quantum electrodynamics. (Sorry I just noticed this addition to the question now!) $$ $$ @Hans: Sad news about Jerry Marsden. | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 22:41 | answer | added | Moduli | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 24, 2010 at 21:08 | answer | added | jvkersch | timeline score: 15 | |
| Sep 24, 2010 at 17:01 | comment | added | Hans Lundmark | A side note: I just learned that Jerrold Marsden passed away this week (aged 68). | |
| Sep 23, 2010 at 19:46 | history | edited | student | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1566 characters in body
|
| Sep 23, 2010 at 19:35 | comment | added | Orbicular | It is interesting to work out the example of the two-body problem (without using the standard "tricks") just by noting the SO(3)-invariance. (Note that we are dealing with singular symplectic reduction in this case!) | |
| Sep 23, 2010 at 17:33 | answer | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | timeline score: 15 | |
| Sep 23, 2010 at 17:30 | answer | added | Thomas Sauvaget | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 23, 2010 at 17:05 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | The post raises some interesting issues, but it's too argumentative for my taste, which is reaffirmed by the "opinion" tag. | |
| Sep 23, 2010 at 16:47 | comment | added | Jan Weidner | This is a nice question! | |
| Sep 23, 2010 at 16:38 | history | asked | student | CC BY-SA 2.5 |