Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by Nate River
Bounty Ended with RobPratt's answer chosen by Nate River
Notice added Draw attention by Nate River
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by Nate River
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Nate River
  • 6.3k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discretenessindivisibility of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select $k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Remark: By a compactness argument one can verify that the supremum is indeed achieved, and so we are justified in speaking of the configuration achieving the maximum.

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discreteness of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select $k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Remark: By a compactness argument one can verify that the supremum is indeed achieved, and so we are justified in speaking of the configuration achieving the maximum.

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with indivisibility of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select $k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Remark: By a compactness argument one can verify that the supremum is indeed achieved, and so we are justified in speaking of the configuration achieving the maximum.

added 131 characters in body
Source Link
Nate River
  • 6.3k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discreteness of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select $k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$ (if the supremum can indeed be achieved)? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Remark: By a compactness argument one can verify that the supremum is indeed achieved, and so we are justified in speaking of the configuration achieving the maximum.

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discreteness of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select $k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$ (if the supremum can indeed be achieved)? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discreteness of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select $k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Remark: By a compactness argument one can verify that the supremum is indeed achieved, and so we are justified in speaking of the configuration achieving the maximum.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
Nate River
  • 6.3k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discreteness of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select k$k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$ (if the supremum can indeed be achieved)? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discreteness of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select k measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$ (if the supremum can indeed be achieved)? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Some motivation:

A company has a certain number of workers. On each given day from Monday to Friday, a fixed number of people are to work. The company wants to foster teamwork, bonding and camaraderie among its team, so it wants to create a weekly schedule that maximises the number of people that have worked with each other on at least one day. How can this be accomplished?

Formal problem (Graph theoretic version):

For $n > 2$, let $G$ be the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices. Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer. We are asked to select subsets $A_1, \dots, A_k$ of the vertex set of $G$ of cardinality $m$ each, where $m < n$ and $km > n$.

For each subset $A_i$, we connect all vertices in $A_i$ to each other. To be more precise, we form the graph $G’$ with vertex set that of $G$, and edge set $E(G’) = \{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i \text{ for some }i\}$.

Question (GT): How can we maximise |E(G’)|? What is the maximum cardinality?

There is also a continuum/continuous version of the problem, which may be easier to deal with since it avoids problems with discreteness of individual people.

Formal problem (Measure theoretic version):

Let $X$ be a non atomic measure space of measure $1$. For concreteness, we may take $[0, 1]$ under the Lebesgue measure.

Let $k > 1$ be a given fixed positive integer, and $m$ a real number with $0 < m < 1$ and $km > 1$. We are asked to select $k$ measurable subsets $A_1, \dots , A_k$ of $X$ of measure $m$.

Question (MT): Which choice of subsets maximises the measure of $\cup_{i = 1}^n A_i \times A_i$ in $X \times X$ (if the supremum can indeed be achieved)? What is the maximal measure?

Here we equip $X \times X$ with the product measure, and $A_i \times A_i$ denotes the set $\{(a, a’) \ | \ a, a’ ∈ A_i\}$.

Source Link
Nate River
  • 6.3k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99
Loading