Timeline for Mistake in Karl Pearson's 1900 paper introducing the chi-squared distribution
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2021 at 0:53 | history | edited | Kimmel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changed tags and title to reflect that the question is about a mistake by Pearson, rather than some terminology difference (as I originally though)
|
| Jul 7, 2021 at 0:51 | answer | added | Kimmel | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 6, 2021 at 22:16 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title
|
| Jul 6, 2021 at 21:03 | history | edited | Kimmel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jul 6, 2021 at 15:58 | comment | added | Carl-Fredrik Nyberg Brodda | Titles of articles these days just aren’t what they used to be...! | |
| Jul 6, 2021 at 13:40 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | the difference between minor and cofactor is only a sign, isn't it likely that Pearson was just sloppy/imprecise? (the words themselves both were first used around 1850) | |
| Jul 6, 2021 at 13:25 | history | edited | Vincent |
added history tag because the primary question is about how words are historically used (vs today). Removed determinants tag because of weird rule that there can only be five tags
|
|
| Jul 6, 2021 at 12:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 6, 2021 at 13:34 | |||||
| Jul 6, 2021 at 12:48 | history | asked | Kimmel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |