Timeline for Which Bianchi identity is due to Bianchi (or not, since it might be due to Ricci (according to Levi-Civita (according to MO))) or vice versa?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
Jan 15, 2015 at 14:57 | vote | accept | Martin Gisser | ||
Jan 15, 2015 at 14:56 | answer | added | Martin Gisser | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 11, 2010 at 14:03 | answer | added | Andrey Rekalo | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 11, 2010 at 13:40 | comment | added | Jonathan Chiche | Actually, your « Swiss cheese memory » seems to be a misnomer, as was pointed out by Tom Leinster in his book « Higher Operads, Higher Categories » (he acknowledges the help of Paul-André Melliès for that). See bottom of p. 63 of arxiv.org/pdf/math/0305049. | |
Oct 18, 2010 at 0:48 | comment | added | Martin Gisser | Meanwhile I've found this paper: Ph. Delanoe, On bianchi identities, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Volume 51 (2002), 237-248. springerlink.com/content/k7qlt4l33568j70q According to the introduction (if I parse it right), the first "algebraic" Bianchi identity is due to Riemann and Christoffel. The second "differential" is due to Bianchi. (Delanoe extends Kazdan's "another proof" to arbitrary vector bundles. Alas he does not mention M. Schlicht's extension to arbitrary principal bundles.) | |
Oct 16, 2010 at 10:01 | answer | added | Aleksei Averchenko | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 16, 2010 at 8:06 | answer | added | Cristi Stoica | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 23, 2010 at 2:30 | history | edited | Martin Gisser | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 363 characters in body
|
Sep 23, 2010 at 2:16 | history | edited | Martin Gisser | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
Sep 23, 2010 at 2:06 | history | asked | Martin Gisser | CC BY-SA 2.5 |