Skip to main content
Elaborated on Dumont's work
Source Link
Tom Copeland
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 57
  • 84

Dumont's paper "Pics de cycle et derivees partielles" gives, on p. 38, the continued fraction for an o.g.f. of the bivariate symmetric Eulerian polynomials as$\bar{E}_n(x,y)$ related to mine by $\bar{E}_n(x,y) = xy \cdot E_n(x,y)$. Dumont's o.g.f. is

$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} A_n(x,y)\; u^n $$$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} \bar{E}_n(x,y)\; u^n $$

so the question becomes what is the continued fraction forbut an e.g.f. givenis used in the compositional inversions above. This begs the questions of how continued fractionfractions of its Laplace transform, or shifted o.g.f.?s and their associated e.g.f.s are related and also the continued fractions of the compositional inverses of the two generating functions.

Dumont's paper "Pics de cycle et derivees partielles" gives, on p. 38, the continued fraction for an o.g.f. of the bivariate Eulerian polynomials as

$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} A_n(x,y)\; u^n $$

so the question becomes what is the continued fraction for an e.g.f. given the continued fraction of its Laplace transform, or shifted o.g.f.?

Dumont's paper "Pics de cycle et derivees partielles" gives, on p. 38, the continued fraction for an o.g.f. of bivariate symmetric Eulerian polynomials $\bar{E}_n(x,y)$ related to mine by $\bar{E}_n(x,y) = xy \cdot E_n(x,y)$. Dumont's o.g.f. is

$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} \bar{E}_n(x,y)\; u^n $$

but an e.g.f. is used in the compositional inversions above. This begs the questions of how continued fractions of o.g.f.s and their associated e.g.f.s are related and also the continued fractions of the compositional inverses of the two generating functions.

A cont fraction for the o.g.f. found
Source Link
Tom Copeland
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 57
  • 84

$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} A_n(x,y) $$$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} A_n(x,y)\; u^n $$

$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} A_n(x,y) $$

$$x + \sum_{n \geq 1} A_n(x,y)\; u^n $$

A cont fraction for the o.g.f. found
Source Link
Tom Copeland
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 57
  • 84

$$ \begin{split} & = \frac{x}{1-\dfrac{yu }{1-\dfrac{xu}{1-\dfrac{ 2yu}{\ddots}} } \; \;}\\ &= SFC[\; x, \; \frac{yu}{xu}, \; 2 \frac{yu}{xu}, \; 3 \frac{yu}{xu},..] \end{split} $$$$ \begin{split} & = \frac{x}{1-\dfrac{yu }{1-\dfrac{xu}{1-\dfrac{ 2yu}{\ddots}} } \; \;}\\ &= SFC[\; x, \; \frac{yu}{xu}, \; \frac{2yu}{2xu}, \; \frac{3yu}{3xu},..] \end{split} $$

$$ \begin{split} & = \frac{x}{1-\dfrac{yu }{1-\dfrac{xu}{1-\dfrac{ 2yu}{\ddots}} } \; \;}\\ &= SFC[\; x, \; \frac{yu}{xu}, \; 2 \frac{yu}{xu}, \; 3 \frac{yu}{xu},..] \end{split} $$

$$ \begin{split} & = \frac{x}{1-\dfrac{yu }{1-\dfrac{xu}{1-\dfrac{ 2yu}{\ddots}} } \; \;}\\ &= SFC[\; x, \; \frac{yu}{xu}, \; \frac{2yu}{2xu}, \; \frac{3yu}{3xu},..] \end{split} $$

A cont fraction for the o.g.f. found
Source Link
Tom Copeland
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 57
  • 84
Loading
Added yet another relation of CFs to another type of lattice path
Source Link
Tom Copeland
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 57
  • 84
Loading
Added potential link to Dyck lattice paths
Source Link
Tom Copeland
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 57
  • 84
Loading
Minor Math Jaxing (bracket scaling, use of `\dfrac` commands and of `split` environment)
Source Link
Daniele Tampieri
  • 6.4k
  • 7
  • 30
  • 45
Loading
Source Link
Tom Copeland
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 57
  • 84
Loading