Return to Question

I am reading a paper 'Periodic Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation and Invariant Measures' written by J.Bourgain. And I am wondering if I can have some help from this website.

My question is an inequality at (3.18) of the paper. The inequality is, with $\lambda>1$ $$\sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2}< e^{-cM_0^{1+\frac{2}{p}}}\lambda^2$$ where the index $M$ is a dyadic [the form of $2^k$] and an arbitrary $M_0>0$ be given. It is mentioned in the paper that he let $\sigma_M=M^{-\frac{1}{p}}+\left( \frac{M_0}{M} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for $M>M_0$. Here, I also assume that the positive constants $c$ and $C$ are changing.

I have been trying to figure out this inequality and, using $\sigma_M$, I was only able to figure out the inequality below. \begin{align*} \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2} &= \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c(M+M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0M^{1/2+1/p})\lambda^2} \\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2}\\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0^{1+2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2} \end{align*}

where the first inequality is due to the fact that $\lambda>1$ and $c$ and $C$ can be modified. And the second inequality is due to the fact that $M>M_0$.

Actually, I don't think the second inequality is good to use for this estimate as it would be independent of $M$ so the sum would be infinity.

As $\lambda>1$, pulling it out of the exponent seems trivial. [But at the same time it could be typo... I am not sure.]

I hope to figure out it... I thank in advance for the answer or any hints.

I am reading a paper 'Periodic Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation and Invariant Measures' written by J.Bourgain. And I am wondering if I can have some help from this website.

My question is an inequality at (3.18) of the paper. The inequality is, with $\lambda>1$ $$\sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2}< e^{-cM_0^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2}$$ where the index $M$ is a dyadic [the form of $2^k$] and an arbitrary $M_0>0$ be given. It is mentioned in the paper that he let $\sigma_M=M^{-\frac{1}{p}}+\left( \frac{M_0}{M} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for $M>M_0$. Here, I also assume that the positive constants $c$ and $C$ are changing.

I have been trying to figure out this inequality and, using $\sigma_M$, I was only able to figure out the inequality below. \begin{align*} \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2} &= \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c(M+M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0M^{1/2+1/p})\lambda^2} \\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2}\\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0^{1+2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2} \end{align*}

where the first inequality is due to the fact that $\lambda>1$ and $c$ and $C$ can be modified. And the second inequality is due to the fact that $M>M_0$.

Actually, I don't think the second inequality is good to use for this estimate as it would be independent of $M$ so the sum would be infinity.

I hope to figure out it... I thank in advance for the answer or any hints.

I am reading a paper 'Periodic Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation and Invariant Measures' written by J.Bourgain. And I am wondering if I can have some help from this website.

My question is an inequality at (3.18) of the paper. The inequality is, with $\lambda>0$ $$\sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2}< e^{-cM_0^{1+\frac{2}{p}}}\lambda^2$$ where the index $M$ is a dyadic [the form of $2^k$] and an arbitrary $M_0>0$ be given. It is mentioned in the paper that he let $\sigma_M=M^{-\frac{1}{p}}+\left( \frac{M_0}{M} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for $M>M_0$. Here, I also assume that the positive constants $c$ and $C$ are changing.

I have been trying to figure out this inequality and, using $\sigma_M$, I was only able to figure out the inequality below. \begin{align*} \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2} &= \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c(M+M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0M^{1/2+1/p})\lambda^2} \\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2}\\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0^{1+2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2} \end{align*}

where the first inequality is due to the fact that $\lambda>0$ and $c$ and $C$ can be modified. And the second inequality is due to the fact that $M>M_0$.

Actually, I don't think the second inequality is good to use for this estimate as it would be independent of $M$ so the sum would be infinity.

As $\lambda>0$, pulling it out of the exponent seems trivial. [But at the same time it could be typo... I am not sure.]

I hope to figure out it... I thank in advance for the answer or any hints.

I am reading a paper 'Periodic Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation and Invariant Measures' written by J.Bourgain. And I am wondering if I can have some help from this website.

My question is an inequality at (3.18) of the paper. The inequality is, with $\lambda>1$ $$\sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2}< e^{-cM_0^{1+\frac{2}{p}}}\lambda^2$$ where the index $M$ is a dyadic [the form of $2^k$] and an arbitrary $M_0>0$ be given. It is mentioned in the paper that he let $\sigma_M=M^{-\frac{1}{p}}+\left( \frac{M_0}{M} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for $M>M_0$. Here, I also assume that the positive constants $c$ and $C$ are changing.

I have been trying to figure out this inequality and, using $\sigma_M$, I was only able to figure out the inequality below. \begin{align*} \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2} &= \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c(M+M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0M^{1/2+1/p})\lambda^2} \\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2}\\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0^{1+2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2} \end{align*}

where the first inequality is due to the fact that $\lambda>1$ and $c$ and $C$ can be modified. And the second inequality is due to the fact that $M>M_0$.

Actually, I don't think the second inequality is good to use for this estimate as it would be independent of $M$ so the sum would be infinity.

As $\lambda>1$, pulling it out of the exponent seems trivial. [But at the same time it could be typo... I am not sure.]

I hope to figure out it... I thank in advance for the answer or any hints.

I am reading a paper 'Periodic Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation and Invariant Measures' written by J.Bourgain. And I am wondering if I can have some help from this website.

My question is an inequality at (3.18) of the paper. The inequality is, with $\lambda>0$ $$\sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2}< e^{-cM_0^{1+\frac{2}{p}}}\lambda^2$$ where the index $M$ is a dyadic [the form of $2^k$] and an arbitrary $M_0>0$ be given. It is mentioned in the paper that he let $\sigma_M=M^{-\frac{1}{p}}+\left( \frac{M_0}{M} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for $M>M_0$. Here, I also assume that the positive constants $c$ and $C$ are changing.

I have been trying to figure out this inequality and, using $\sigma_M$, I was only able to figure out the inequality below. \begin{align*} \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2} &= \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c(M+M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0M^{1/2+1/p})\lambda^2} \\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2}\\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0^{1+2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2} \end{align*}

where the first inequality is due to the fact that $\lambda>0$ and $c$ and $C$ can be modified. And the second inequality is due to the fact that $M>M_0$.

Actually, I don't think the second inequality is good to use for this estimate as it would be independent of $M$ so the sum would be infinity.

As $\lambda>0$, pulling it out of the exponent seems trivial. [But at the same time it could be typo... I am not sure.]

I hope to figure out it... I thank in advance for the answer or any hints.

I am reading a paper 'Periodic Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation and Invariant Measures' written by J.Bourgain. And I am wondering if I can have some help from this website.

My question is an inequality at (3.18) of the paper. The inequality is, with $\lambda>0$ $$\sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2}< e^{-cM_0^{1+\frac{2}{p}}}\lambda^2$$ where the index $M$ is a dyadic [the form of $2^k$] and an arbitrary $M_0>0$ be given. It is mentioned in the paper that he let $\sigma_M=M^{-\frac{1}{p}}+\left( \frac{M_0}{M} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ for $M>M_0$. Here, I also assume that the positive constants $c$ and $C$ are changing.

I have been trying to figure out this inequality and, using $\sigma_M$, I was only able to figure out the inequality below. \begin{align*} \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c\sigma_M^2 M^{1+\frac{2}{p}}\lambda^2} &= \sum_{M>M_0} e^{CM-c(M+M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0M^{1/2+1/p})\lambda^2} \\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0M^{2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2}\\ &< \sum_{M>M_0} e^{-c(M_0^{1+2/p}+2M_0^{1+1/p})\lambda^2} \end{align*}

where the first inequality is due to the fact that $\lambda>0$ and $c$ and $C$ can be modified. And the second inequality is due to the fact that $M>M_0$.

Actually, I don't think the second inequality is good to use for this estimate as it would be independent of $M$ so the sum would be infinity.

As $\lambda>0$, pulling it out of the exponent seems trivial. [But at the same time it could be typo... I am not sure.]

I hope to figure out it... I thank in advance for the answer or any hints.