Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jun 29, 2021 at 9:50 history bounty ended Jose Arnaldo Bebita
S Jun 29, 2021 at 9:50 history notice removed Jose Arnaldo Bebita
Jun 28, 2021 at 10:45 vote accept Jose Arnaldo Bebita
Jun 28, 2021 at 10:00 answer added mathlove timeline score: 1
S Jun 28, 2021 at 9:03 history bounty started Jose Arnaldo Bebita
S Jun 28, 2021 at 9:03 history notice added Jose Arnaldo Bebita Draw attention
Jun 25, 2021 at 13:40 history edited Jose Arnaldo Bebita CC BY-SA 4.0
added/corrected context
Jun 25, 2021 at 4:25 history edited Jose Arnaldo Bebita CC BY-SA 4.0
added context, in response to Mike Bennett's comment
Jun 25, 2021 at 4:24 comment added Jose Arnaldo Bebita Okay doing so now.
Jun 25, 2021 at 4:23 comment added Mike Bennett Then state that in the question.
Jun 25, 2021 at 3:46 comment added Jose Arnaldo Bebita @MikeBennett: For the particular problem that we are considering (the problem of determining whether $m < p^k$ holds in general for an odd perfect number $p^k m^2$ with special prime $p$), we know that $p \equiv k \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ holds. So $k = 2j$ is not possible, and your argument breaks down.
Jun 25, 2021 at 3:44 comment added Jose Arnaldo Bebita @MaxAlekseyev: When $p^k m^2$ is an odd perfect number with special prime $p$ satisfying $\sigma(m^2)/p^k$ is a square, then $\sigma(m^2) \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $k = 1$. But $\sigma(m^2) \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ is equivalent to $p \equiv k \pmod 8$. Therefore, if $\sigma(m^2)/p^k$ is a square, then $m^2 - p^k \equiv 0 \pmod 8$. Which is the reason why we put $2^r t$ for $m^2 - p^k$ there. But we do get your point.
Jun 24, 2021 at 22:33 comment added Mike Bennett If you just take $k=2j$, $m=2^r+p^j$, $t=m+p^j$ and assume that $2^r > p^{2j}$, then this is always satisfied.
Jun 24, 2021 at 14:35 comment added Max Alekseyev Why not replace $2^rt$ with $4s$ having just a single variable?
Jun 24, 2021 at 10:44 history asked Jose Arnaldo Bebita CC BY-SA 4.0