Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 24, 2021 at 22:33 vote accept Pedro
Jun 24, 2021 at 20:18 answer added Igor Khavkine timeline score: 8
Jun 24, 2021 at 15:23 comment added Timothy Chow Related: Mathematical foundations of Quantum Field Theory and Mathematics of path integral: state of the art.
Jun 24, 2021 at 14:36 comment added Pedro @CarloBeenakker The question is about the former, a mathematically well-defined but still perturbative version of these computations. Perhaps if convergence isn't known my question is to what extent can they be made well-defined rigorously.
Jun 24, 2021 at 14:34 comment added Pedro @IgorKhavkine I have looked at several questions here but they all seem to be concerned with the construction of rigorous QFTs à la Wightman axioms etc., and not effective field theories.
Jun 24, 2021 at 11:39 comment added Carlo Beenakker you mention a problem like a calculation of the "electron magnetic dipole moment" --- this quantity is only known as a perturbation series in the fine structure constant; are you interested in a "rigorous" calculation of the coefficients in this expansion, or do you wish a nonperturbative calculation? The latter does not exist, rigorous or not.
Jun 24, 2021 at 9:37 comment added Igor Khavkine Have you considered searching this site for the keywords 'rigorous' and 'QFT'?
Jun 24, 2021 at 8:52 history edited YCor
edited tags
Jun 24, 2021 at 4:52 comment added user1092847 As far as I'm aware, Costello's approach is fundamentally perturbative: i.e. the planck constant is considered to be a formal parameter, and issues of convergence are not treated. So it can't be used to construct an "actual" QFT in the sense of the usual axiomatizations.
Jun 24, 2021 at 1:52 history asked Pedro CC BY-SA 4.0