Timeline for Trivialisation of Mobius Line Bundle
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2010 at 16:29 | comment | added | Donu Arapura | The boundaries between alg. geom and topology are pretty fluid, and I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. But as Scott suggested below, G & H is not the best place to first learn this stuff. | |
| Sep 21, 2010 at 15:29 | vote | accept | Noel Robinson | ||
| Sep 21, 2010 at 15:29 | comment | added | Noel Robinson | Thank you for your prompt response to the dual of the question asked (which I now understand from the response below was not even well formed). Btw I was seeking to understand this on my way to a proper appreciation of the Picard Group (or is that not now algebraic geometry either?) | |
| Sep 21, 2010 at 15:05 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Donu: well, it's real algebraic geometry (and, yes, basic topology). | |
| Sep 21, 2010 at 14:53 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 21, 2010 at 14:17 | comment | added | Donu Arapura | A quick suggestion: work backwards. Construct the bundle using the trivialization, and convince yourself its a Mobius strip. (By the way, the bundle isn't holomorphic, and this isn't algebraic geometry, it's really basic topology.) | |
| Sep 21, 2010 at 14:03 | history | asked | Noel Robinson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |