Skip to main content
While it's bumped anyway, Holder -> Hölder
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Not that I have ever seen this used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy-SchwarzCauchy–Schwarz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder'sHölder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq (\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]})^{1/(p-1)}$$P(X>0)\geq \left(\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]}\right)^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

Not that I have ever seen this used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy-Schwarz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq (\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]})^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

Not that I have ever seen this used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy–Schwarz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Hölder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq \left(\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]}\right)^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

correct spelling
Source Link
coudy
  • 18.7k
  • 5
  • 75
  • 135

Not that I have ever seen this used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy Schwartz-Schwarz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq (\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]})^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

Not that I have ever seen this used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy Schwartz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq (\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]})^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

Not that I have ever seen this used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy-Schwarz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq (\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]})^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

added 110 characters in body
Source Link

Not that I have ever seen thatthis used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy Schwartz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq (\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]})^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

Not that I have ever seen that used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy Schwartz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities?

Not that I have ever seen this used anywhere (so this might be the wrong direction), but since the second moment method is essentially using Cauchy Schwartz on the variable $X=X 1_{X>0}$, can't we use Holder's inequality on this expression to obtain higher order inequalities? edit: and obtain something like $P(X>0)\geq (\frac{E[X]^p}{E[X^p]})^{1/(p-1)}$ (assuming $X\geq 0$ and $p>1$).

Source Link
Loading