Timeline for A basis of holomorphic differentials on Fermat curves
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 31, 2021 at 21:17 | vote | accept | yyc | ||
May 31, 2021 at 20:33 | answer | added | dhy | timeline score: 6 | |
May 31, 2021 at 15:35 | comment | added | yyc | @dhy: Thank you, that is very simple. I have been meaning to learn more about representation theory. If you want to turn it into an answer I will accept. | |
May 31, 2021 at 7:19 | comment | added | dhy | I suspect what Hidalgo has in mind is the following representation-theoretic argument (which can also be rephrased in elementary terms): The automorphisms $a_1,a_2,a_3$ are part of a $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ action. The pullback formula tells you that each $\theta_{r,\alpha}$ generates a character (1-dim representation) of the group, and the characters corresponding to different $(r,\alpha)$ are different. Therefore there can be no nontrivial relations between them. I don't really see why the divisor formula is necessary though. | |
May 31, 2021 at 4:52 | history | edited | yyc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
May 31, 2021 at 4:41 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 5, 2021 at 3:03 | |||||
May 31, 2021 at 4:14 | history | edited | yyc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
May 31, 2021 at 3:55 | history | edited | yyc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
May 31, 2021 at 3:39 | history | edited | yyc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
May 31, 2021 at 3:31 | review | First posts | |||
May 31, 2021 at 4:06 | |||||
May 31, 2021 at 3:27 | history | asked | yyc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |