Skip to main content
33 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 13, 2022 at 19:42 vote accept BD107
Nov 7, 2021 at 1:51 vote accept BD107
May 13, 2022 at 19:42
Nov 3, 2021 at 15:31 answer added BD107 timeline score: 0
S Aug 21, 2021 at 1:02 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Aug 21, 2021 at 1:02 history notice removed CommunityBot
Aug 13, 2021 at 23:18 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 38 characters in body
Aug 13, 2021 at 20:48 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
_undo_ renaming H --> A. this is to make it consistent with the existing answer
Aug 13, 2021 at 1:48 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Aug 13, 2021 at 1:42 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
rename A --> H.
Aug 13, 2021 at 1:36 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 450 characters in body
S Aug 12, 2021 at 23:59 history bounty started BD107
S Aug 12, 2021 at 23:59 history notice added BD107 Draw attention
Aug 12, 2021 at 23:58 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
add some detail; mention [MR78].
Aug 12, 2021 at 23:50 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
add some detail; mention [MR78].
S Jun 7, 2021 at 21:24 history bounty ended BD107
S Jun 7, 2021 at 21:24 history notice removed BD107
Jun 2, 2021 at 17:17 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
added an edit regarding Antoine Labelle's answer.
Jun 2, 2021 at 2:46 answer added Antoine Labelle timeline score: 4
Jun 1, 2021 at 14:20 comment added BD107 @PeterTaylor thanks, tags added.
Jun 1, 2021 at 14:20 history edited BD107
added tags
Jun 1, 2021 at 14:06 comment added Peter Taylor Another phrasing would be that we define the $j$th excluded affine hyperplane $E_j = \{ (x_0, x_1, \ldots, x_n) \mid x_{2j} + x_{2j+1} = 2 \}$ and then the question becomes: "If $A \cap \{0,1\}^n \cap (\cup E_j) = \emptyset$, how big can $A \cap \{0,1\}^n$ be?" There must surely be some geometry tag which is at least as good a fit for the question as nt.number-theory?
May 31, 2021 at 14:08 comment added BD107 you are absolutely correct, clarified. thanks.
May 31, 2021 at 14:08 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
clarified function, as per Emil Jeřábek
May 31, 2021 at 14:06 comment added Emil Jeřábek Can you clarify the definition of the function? The title suggests that the three dots should be filled as $(\overline{x_0}\lor\overline{x_1})\land(\overline{x_1}\lor\overline{x_2})\land(\overline{x_2}\lor\overline{x_3})\land(\overline{x_3}\lor\overline{x_4})\land\dots$ (which is also the most obvious reading), but then the numbers don’t work out. Based on the “dual formulation”, do you actually mean $(\overline{x_0}\lor\overline{x_1})\land(\overline{x_2}\lor\overline{x_3})\land(\overline{x_4}\lor\overline{x_5})\land(\overline{x_6}\lor\overline{x_7})\land\dots$?
S May 31, 2021 at 13:48 history bounty started BD107
S May 31, 2021 at 13:48 history notice added BD107 Draw attention
May 31, 2021 at 13:47 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
restructured the problem to focus on fields, and be clearer.
May 29, 2021 at 22:16 comment added BD107 it's an original problem; posed it myself, with some inspiration from a colleague as well.
May 29, 2021 at 20:26 comment added kodlu Interesting. Do you have a reference from the literature or is the problem original?
May 29, 2021 at 15:54 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
another attempt to improve the title
May 29, 2021 at 15:48 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
change title to be more compact.
May 29, 2021 at 3:13 history edited BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0
correct function notation
May 29, 2021 at 2:51 history asked BD107 CC BY-SA 4.0