Skip to main content
typo corrected
Source Link

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal and $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$ is equal to $\mathfrak{k}$ as a real vector space, but with the complex scalar multiplication equaling that of $\mathfrak{k}$ composed with complex conjugation of the scalar factor. In other words, we have that for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, $\alpha\in\mathbb{C}$ (edit - November 11th 2022, see Alan Garbarz's comment below) $$(f,g)+(f',g')=(f+f',g+g')\ ,\,\alpha(f,g)=(\alpha f,\bar{\alpha}g)$$ and $$\langle (f,f'),(g,g')\rangle=\langle f,g\rangle+\overline{\langle f',g'\rangle}=\langle f,g\rangle+\langle g',f'\rangle\ .$$ The above definition for the scalar product of $\mathfrak{h}$ from that of $\mathfrak{k}$ guarantees sesquilinearity as well as the mutual orthogonality of both direct summands w.r.t. each other. These correspond respectively to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ Now, thanks to the definition of $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, we have that $f\mapsto c(f)$ is actually linear, therefore $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ is antilinear and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ is (complex) linear, contrary to the case of Majorana field operators. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$$$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c^*(f),c(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal and $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$ is equal to $\mathfrak{k}$ as a real vector space, but with the complex scalar multiplication equaling that of $\mathfrak{k}$ composed with complex conjugation of the scalar factor. In other words, we have that for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, $\alpha\in\mathbb{C}$ (edit - November 11th 2022, see Alan Garbarz's comment below) $$(f,g)+(f',g')=(f+f',g+g')\ ,\,\alpha(f,g)=(\alpha f,\bar{\alpha}g)$$ and $$\langle (f,f'),(g,g')\rangle=\langle f,g\rangle+\overline{\langle f',g'\rangle}=\langle f,g\rangle+\langle g',f'\rangle\ .$$ The above definition for the scalar product of $\mathfrak{h}$ from that of $\mathfrak{k}$ guarantees sesquilinearity as well as the mutual orthogonality of both direct summands w.r.t. each other. These correspond respectively to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ Now, thanks to the definition of $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, we have that $f\mapsto c(f)$ is actually linear, therefore $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ is antilinear and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ is (complex) linear, contrary to the case of Majorana field operators. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal and $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$ is equal to $\mathfrak{k}$ as a real vector space, but with the complex scalar multiplication equaling that of $\mathfrak{k}$ composed with complex conjugation of the scalar factor. In other words, we have that for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, $\alpha\in\mathbb{C}$ (edit - November 11th 2022, see Alan Garbarz's comment below) $$(f,g)+(f',g')=(f+f',g+g')\ ,\,\alpha(f,g)=(\alpha f,\bar{\alpha}g)$$ and $$\langle (f,f'),(g,g')\rangle=\langle f,g\rangle+\overline{\langle f',g'\rangle}=\langle f,g\rangle+\langle g',f'\rangle\ .$$ The above definition for the scalar product of $\mathfrak{h}$ from that of $\mathfrak{k}$ guarantees sesquilinearity as well as the mutual orthogonality of both direct summands w.r.t. each other. These correspond respectively to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ Now, thanks to the definition of $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, we have that $f\mapsto c(f)$ is actually linear, therefore $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ is antilinear and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ is (complex) linear, contrary to the case of Majorana field operators. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c^*(f),c(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

Fixed error in the construction of Dirac field operators
Source Link

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\mathfrak{k}$$\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal and $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$ is equal to $\mathfrak{k}$ as a real vector space, but with the complex scalar multiplication equaling that of $\mathfrak{k}$ composed with complex conjugation of the scalar factor. TheseIn other words, we have that for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, $\alpha\in\mathbb{C}$ (edit - November 11th 2022, see Alan Garbarz's comment below) $$(f,g)+(f',g')=(f+f',g+g')\ ,\,\alpha(f,g)=(\alpha f,\bar{\alpha}g)$$ and $$\langle (f,f'),(g,g')\rangle=\langle f,g\rangle+\overline{\langle f',g'\rangle}=\langle f,g\rangle+\langle g',f'\rangle\ .$$ The above definition for the scalar product of $\mathfrak{h}$ from that of $\mathfrak{k}$ guarantees sesquilinearity as well as the mutual orthogonality of both direct summands w.r.t. each other. These correspond respectively to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ As beforeNow, thanks to the definition of $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, we pointhave that $f\mapsto c(f)$ is actually linear, therefore $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ is antilinear and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ are onlyis real(complex) linear linear, contrary to the case of Majorana field operators. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ We remark that, as before with the Majorana field operators, $b(f)$, $c(f)$ (and therefore also $a((f_1,f_2))=b(f_1)+c(f_2)$) can be recovered from $\psi(f)$ and $\psi^*(f)$ for each $f(,f_1,f_2)\in\mathfrak{k}$ in a way similar to the recovery of the bosonic annihilation operators from the free bosonic field operators - to wit, $$b(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)+i\psi(if))\ ,\,c(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)+i\psi^*(if))\ ,$$ hence $$b^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)-i\psi^*(if))\ ,\,c^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)-i\psi(if))\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\mathfrak{k}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal. These direct summands correspond to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ As before, we point that $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ are only real linear. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ We remark that, as before with the Majorana field operators, $b(f)$, $c(f)$ (and therefore also $a((f_1,f_2))=b(f_1)+c(f_2)$) can be recovered from $\psi(f)$ and $\psi^*(f)$ for each $f(,f_1,f_2)\in\mathfrak{k}$ in a way similar to the recovery of the bosonic annihilation operators from the free bosonic field operators - to wit, $$b(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)+i\psi(if))\ ,\,c(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)+i\psi^*(if))\ ,$$ hence $$b^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)-i\psi^*(if))\ ,\,c^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)-i\psi(if))\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal and $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$ is equal to $\mathfrak{k}$ as a real vector space, but with the complex scalar multiplication equaling that of $\mathfrak{k}$ composed with complex conjugation of the scalar factor. In other words, we have that for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, $\alpha\in\mathbb{C}$ (edit - November 11th 2022, see Alan Garbarz's comment below) $$(f,g)+(f',g')=(f+f',g+g')\ ,\,\alpha(f,g)=(\alpha f,\bar{\alpha}g)$$ and $$\langle (f,f'),(g,g')\rangle=\langle f,g\rangle+\overline{\langle f',g'\rangle}=\langle f,g\rangle+\langle g',f'\rangle\ .$$ The above definition for the scalar product of $\mathfrak{h}$ from that of $\mathfrak{k}$ guarantees sesquilinearity as well as the mutual orthogonality of both direct summands w.r.t. each other. These correspond respectively to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ Now, thanks to the definition of $\bar{\mathfrak{k}}$, we have that $f\mapsto c(f)$ is actually linear, therefore $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ is antilinear and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ is (complex) linear, contrary to the case of Majorana field operators. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

Added formula
Source Link

Notice that the CAR's imply that $$(a^*(f)a(f))^2=a^*(f)\{a(f),a^*(f)\}a(f)=\|f\|^2a^*(f)a(f)\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{h}$$ hence if there is a C${}^*\!$-norm $\|\cdot\|$ on $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$, we must have $$\|(a^*(f)a(f))^2\|=\|a^*(f)a(f)\|^2=\|f\|^2\|a^*(f)a(f)\|\ ,$$ therefore $\|a(f)\|=\|a^*(f)\|=\|f\|$ for all $f\in\mathfrak{h}$. In other words, unlike for bosonic fields, fermionic creation and annihilation operators are necessarily bounded, thanks to the Pauli exclusion principle encoded in the CAR's. To show that such a C${}^*\!$-norm actually exists, notice that there is a nontrivial *-representation of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ in the fermionic (i.e. anti-symmetric) Fock space $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ generated by $\mathfrak{h}$: $$\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})=\bigoplus^\infty_{n=0}\wedge^n\mathfrak{h}\ ,$$ where $\wedge^0\mathfrak{h}=\mathbb{C}$, $\wedge^1\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{h}$, and $\wedge^n\mathfrak{h}$ for $n>1$ is the vector space generated by the $n$-fold wedge (i.e. anti-symmetrized tensor) product of elements of $\mathfrak{h}$: $$f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\sigma\in\mathbb{S}_n}\epsilon_\sigma f_{\sigma(1)}\otimes\cdots\otimes f_{\sigma(n)}\ ,$$ where $\mathbb{S}_n$ is the group of permutations of $n$ elements and $\epsilon_\sigma$ ( = $(-1)^{inv(\sigma)}$, $inv(\sigma)=$number of inversions of $\sigma\in\mathbb{S}_n$) is the sign of the permutation $\sigma$, endowed with the scalar product $$\langle f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n,g_1\wedge\cdots\wedge g_n\rangle=\det[\langle f_i,g_j\rangle]\ .$$ The direct sum is assumed to be orthogonal. The action of $a(f),a^*(f)$ on $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ is given by $$a(f)\lambda=0\ ,\,a^*(f)\lambda=\lambda f\ ,\quad\lambda\in\mathbb{C}\ ,$$ $$a(f)f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\langle f,f_1\rangle f_2\wedge\cdots\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n\ ,$$ $$a^*(f)f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\sqrt{n+1}f\wedge f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n\ ,\quad f_1,\ldots,f_n\in\mathfrak{h}\ .$$ It is easy to verify that this defines a *-representation of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ by bounded linear operators on $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ (boundedness is guaranteed by the CAR's as shown above). This ensures that the completion of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ w.r.t. the maximal C${}^*\!$-norm $\|\cdot\|$ is a C${}^*\!$-algebra $\mathfrak{A}$ acting on the Fock Hilbert space $\overline{\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})}$, called the CAR algebra associated to $\mathfrak{h}$. As written, one is only able to define Majorana (i.e. Hermitian) fermionic field operators $$\psi_R(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(a^*(f)+a(f))\ .$$$$\psi_R(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(a^*(f)+a(f))\ ,$$ from which $a(f)$ and $a^*(f)$ may be recovered through the formula $$a(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_R(f)+i\psi_R(if))\ ,\,a^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_R(f)-i\psi_R(if))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{h}\ .$$ We remark that the map $f\mapsto\psi_R(f)$ is only real linear.

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\mathfrak{k}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal. These direct summands correspond to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ WeAs before, we point that $h\mapsto\psi_R(h)$, $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ are only real linear. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ We remark that, as before with the Majorana field operators, $b(f)$, $c(f)$ (and therefore also $a((f_1,f_2))=b(f_1)+c(f_2)$) can be recovered from $\psi(f)$ and $\psi^*(f)$ for each $f(,f_1,f_2)\in\mathfrak{k}$ in a way similar to the recovery of the bosonic annihilation operators from the free bosonic field operators - to wit, $$b(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)+i\psi(if))\ ,\,c(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)+i\psi^*(if))\ ,$$ hence $$b^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)-i\psi^*(if))\ ,\,c^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)-i\psi(if))\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

Notice that the CAR's imply that $$(a^*(f)a(f))^2=a^*(f)\{a(f),a^*(f)\}a(f)=\|f\|^2a^*(f)a(f)\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{h}$$ hence if there is a C${}^*\!$-norm $\|\cdot\|$ on $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$, we must have $$\|(a^*(f)a(f))^2\|=\|a^*(f)a(f)\|^2=\|f\|^2\|a^*(f)a(f)\|\ ,$$ therefore $\|a(f)\|=\|a^*(f)\|=\|f\|$ for all $f\in\mathfrak{h}$. In other words, unlike for bosonic fields, fermionic creation and annihilation operators are necessarily bounded, thanks to the Pauli exclusion principle encoded in the CAR's. To show that such a C${}^*\!$-norm actually exists, notice that there is a nontrivial *-representation of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ in the fermionic (i.e. anti-symmetric) Fock space $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ generated by $\mathfrak{h}$: $$\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})=\bigoplus^\infty_{n=0}\wedge^n\mathfrak{h}\ ,$$ where $\wedge^0\mathfrak{h}=\mathbb{C}$, $\wedge^1\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{h}$, and $\wedge^n\mathfrak{h}$ for $n>1$ is the vector space generated by the $n$-fold wedge (i.e. anti-symmetrized tensor) product of elements of $\mathfrak{h}$: $$f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\sigma\in\mathbb{S}_n}\epsilon_\sigma f_{\sigma(1)}\otimes\cdots\otimes f_{\sigma(n)}\ ,$$ where $\mathbb{S}_n$ is the group of permutations of $n$ elements and $\epsilon_\sigma$ ( = $(-1)^{inv(\sigma)}$, $inv(\sigma)=$number of inversions of $\sigma\in\mathbb{S}_n$) is the sign of the permutation $\sigma$, endowed with the scalar product $$\langle f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n,g_1\wedge\cdots\wedge g_n\rangle=\det[\langle f_i,g_j\rangle]\ .$$ The direct sum is assumed to be orthogonal. The action of $a(f),a^*(f)$ on $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ is given by $$a(f)\lambda=0\ ,\,a^*(f)\lambda=\lambda f\ ,\quad\lambda\in\mathbb{C}\ ,$$ $$a(f)f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\langle f,f_1\rangle f_2\wedge\cdots\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n\ ,$$ $$a^*(f)f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\sqrt{n+1}f\wedge f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n\ ,\quad f_1,\ldots,f_n\in\mathfrak{h}\ .$$ It is easy to verify that this defines a *-representation of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ by bounded linear operators on $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ (boundedness is guaranteed by the CAR's as shown above). This ensures that the completion of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ w.r.t. the maximal C${}^*\!$-norm $\|\cdot\|$ is a C${}^*\!$-algebra $\mathfrak{A}$ acting on the Fock Hilbert space $\overline{\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})}$, called the CAR algebra associated to $\mathfrak{h}$. As written, one is only able to define Majorana (i.e. Hermitian) fermionic field operators $$\psi_R(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(a^*(f)+a(f))\ .$$

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\mathfrak{k}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal. These direct summands correspond to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ We point that $h\mapsto\psi_R(h)$, $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ are only real linear. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ We remark that $b(f)$, $c(f)$ (and therefore $a((f_1,f_2))=b(f_1)+c(f_2)$) can be recovered from $\psi(f)$ and $\psi^*(f)$ for each $f(,f_1,f_2)\in\mathfrak{k}$ in a way similar to the recovery of the bosonic annihilation operators from the free bosonic field operators - to wit, $$b(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)+i\psi(if))\ ,\,c(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)+i\psi^*(if))\ ,$$ hence $$b^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)-i\psi^*(if))\ ,\,c^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)-i\psi(if))\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

Notice that the CAR's imply that $$(a^*(f)a(f))^2=a^*(f)\{a(f),a^*(f)\}a(f)=\|f\|^2a^*(f)a(f)\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{h}$$ hence if there is a C${}^*\!$-norm $\|\cdot\|$ on $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$, we must have $$\|(a^*(f)a(f))^2\|=\|a^*(f)a(f)\|^2=\|f\|^2\|a^*(f)a(f)\|\ ,$$ therefore $\|a(f)\|=\|a^*(f)\|=\|f\|$ for all $f\in\mathfrak{h}$. In other words, unlike for bosonic fields, fermionic creation and annihilation operators are necessarily bounded, thanks to the Pauli exclusion principle encoded in the CAR's. To show that such a C${}^*\!$-norm actually exists, notice that there is a nontrivial *-representation of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ in the fermionic (i.e. anti-symmetric) Fock space $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ generated by $\mathfrak{h}$: $$\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})=\bigoplus^\infty_{n=0}\wedge^n\mathfrak{h}\ ,$$ where $\wedge^0\mathfrak{h}=\mathbb{C}$, $\wedge^1\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{h}$, and $\wedge^n\mathfrak{h}$ for $n>1$ is the vector space generated by the $n$-fold wedge (i.e. anti-symmetrized tensor) product of elements of $\mathfrak{h}$: $$f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\sigma\in\mathbb{S}_n}\epsilon_\sigma f_{\sigma(1)}\otimes\cdots\otimes f_{\sigma(n)}\ ,$$ where $\mathbb{S}_n$ is the group of permutations of $n$ elements and $\epsilon_\sigma$ ( = $(-1)^{inv(\sigma)}$, $inv(\sigma)=$number of inversions of $\sigma\in\mathbb{S}_n$) is the sign of the permutation $\sigma$, endowed with the scalar product $$\langle f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n,g_1\wedge\cdots\wedge g_n\rangle=\det[\langle f_i,g_j\rangle]\ .$$ The direct sum is assumed to be orthogonal. The action of $a(f),a^*(f)$ on $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ is given by $$a(f)\lambda=0\ ,\,a^*(f)\lambda=\lambda f\ ,\quad\lambda\in\mathbb{C}\ ,$$ $$a(f)f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\langle f,f_1\rangle f_2\wedge\cdots\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n\ ,$$ $$a^*(f)f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n=\sqrt{n+1}f\wedge f_1\wedge\cdots\wedge f_n\ ,\quad f_1,\ldots,f_n\in\mathfrak{h}\ .$$ It is easy to verify that this defines a *-representation of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ by bounded linear operators on $\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})$ (boundedness is guaranteed by the CAR's as shown above). This ensures that the completion of $\text{CAR}_0(\mathfrak{h})$ w.r.t. the maximal C${}^*\!$-norm $\|\cdot\|$ is a C${}^*\!$-algebra $\mathfrak{A}$ acting on the Fock Hilbert space $\overline{\mathfrak{F}_-(\mathfrak{h})}$, called the CAR algebra associated to $\mathfrak{h}$. As written, one is only able to define Majorana (i.e. Hermitian) fermionic field operators $$\psi_R(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(a^*(f)+a(f))\ ,$$ from which $a(f)$ and $a^*(f)$ may be recovered through the formula $$a(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_R(f)+i\psi_R(if))\ ,\,a^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_R(f)-i\psi_R(if))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{h}\ .$$ We remark that the map $f\mapsto\psi_R(f)$ is only real linear.

To obtain the actual Dirac fields, $\mathfrak{h}$ needs to have the form $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\mathfrak{k}$, where this direct sum is orthogonal. These direct summands correspond to the particle and antiparticle sectors. Defining $$b(f)=a((f,0))\ ,\,c(f)=a((0,f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ ,$$ one can define the Dirac field operators $$\psi(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(b(f)+c^*(f))\ ,\psi^*(f)=\psi(f)^*=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(c(f)+b^*(f))\ ,\quad f\in\mathfrak{k}\ .$$ As before, we point that $f\mapsto\psi(f)$ and $f\mapsto\psi^*(f)$ are only real linear. The above yields the CAR's in Dirac form $$\{b(f),b(g)\}=\{b(f),c(g)\}=\{c(f),c(g)\}=\{b(f),c^*(g)\}=\{c(f),b^*(g)\}=0\ ,$$ $$\{b(f),b^*(g)\}=\{c(f),c^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}$$ for all $f,g\in\mathfrak{k}$, hence $$\{\psi(f),\psi(g)\}=0\ ,\,\{\psi(f),\psi^*(g)\}=\langle f,g\rangle\mathbf{1}\ .$$ We remark that, as before with the Majorana field operators, $b(f)$, $c(f)$ (and therefore also $a((f_1,f_2))=b(f_1)+c(f_2)$) can be recovered from $\psi(f)$ and $\psi^*(f)$ for each $f(,f_1,f_2)\in\mathfrak{k}$ in a way similar to the recovery of the bosonic annihilation operators from the free bosonic field operators - to wit, $$b(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)+i\psi(if))\ ,\,c(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)+i\psi^*(if))\ ,$$ hence $$b^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi^*(f)-i\psi^*(if))\ ,\,c^*(f)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi(f)-i\psi(if))\ .$$ All that is left is the construction of the one-particle pre-Hilbert space $\mathfrak{k}$, which can be identified with the space of initial data for positive-energy solutions of the Dirac equation.

Added formula
Source Link
Loading
Added explanation
Source Link
Loading
Added correction
Source Link
Loading
Typos corrected, added formula
Source Link
Loading
Typos corrected, added formula
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading