Timeline for Ways to prove the fundamental theorem of algebra
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2019 at 13:43 | comment | added | Yaakov Baruch | @RyanReich: please see Matt F.'s comments here: mathoverflow.net/a/348665/2480. | |
| Dec 23, 2019 at 13:42 | comment | added | Yaakov Baruch | @Qfwfq: please see Matt F.'s comments here: mathoverflow.net/a/348665/2480 | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 18:59 | comment | added | Ryan Reich | Rule of thumb: there is an epsilon of difference between algebra and analysis :) | |
| Apr 15, 2012 at 4:20 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | @Michael: that is probably the comment with least mathematical content I have ever read one MO :D | |
| Feb 3, 2011 at 0:27 | comment | added | Not Mike | formally its just a relation, a symbol in the language of ordered spaces with no intrinsic significance, or assumptions, beyond those associated with it in the definition. | |
| Oct 17, 2010 at 16:30 | comment | added | Qfwfq | It is not so clear to me whether to consider "<" a purely algebraic concept or not. | |
| Sep 20, 2010 at 9:16 | history | edited | Yaakov Baruch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 20, 2010 at 9:06 | history | answered | Yaakov Baruch | CC BY-SA 2.5 |