Timeline for Solve in positive integers: $n!=m(m+1)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2010 at 23:45 | comment | added | Jérôme JEAN-CHARLES | Assuming this is an heuristic argument, I still have a problem with this when using a serie: I feel you are making some regularity assumption that you do not specify. In fact there could be very very few $n$ - yet an infinite number- ( like one every triple exponential) that will not change the serie convergence and not by much. Could you specify that "regularity" or "independence". | |
| Sep 21, 2010 at 5:50 | comment | added | Alexey Ustinov | Probabilistic arguments are clear. They are even more powerful than $abc$-conjecture. | |
| Sep 20, 2010 at 17:04 | comment | added | Dror Speiser | The probability that N(N+1) is divisible by 3 is not 1/3, then shouldn't this also be accounted for? | |
| Sep 20, 2010 at 12:13 | comment | added | Denis Serre | @Chris. Yes I did. Thanks for the correction. | |
| Sep 20, 2010 at 12:12 | history | edited | Denis Serre | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Sep 20, 2010 at 11:30 | comment | added | Chris Wuthrich | Did you mean $N = [\sqrt{n!}]$ in the first line ? | |
| Sep 20, 2010 at 6:38 | history | answered | Denis Serre | CC BY-SA 2.5 |