Timeline for Epsilon regularity: what does it say and where does it come from?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2010 at 17:26 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 572 characters in body
|
| Sep 21, 2010 at 18:39 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added missing comma
|
| Sep 21, 2010 at 15:29 | comment | added | Deane Yang | hce, I don't see any geometric interpretation for the integral bounds and would be interested if you have one. But after you get a pointwise bound on curvature, then the usual geometric interpretations of curvature in terms of holonomy or Jacobi fields (for Riemann and Ricci curvature) become relevant. | |
| Sep 21, 2010 at 15:27 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 21, 2010 at 9:34 | comment | added | hce | Many thanks for this answer! I still haven't digested it properly, but I understand the critical trick. I will probably ask for details soon as I still find it difficult to see what's happening geometrically. | |
| Sep 20, 2010 at 19:30 | history | undeleted | Deane Yang | ||
| Sep 20, 2010 at 19:29 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 285 characters in body
|
| Sep 19, 2010 at 3:50 | history | deleted | Deane Yang | ||
| Sep 19, 2010 at 3:47 | history | answered | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |