Timeline for (Finite) Classification Theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Sep 19, 2010 at 14:40 | answer | added | Haim | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 19, 2010 at 7:39 | answer | added | Stefan Geschke | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 19, 2010 at 0:17 | answer | added | Richard Borcherds | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 18, 2010 at 23:34 | answer | added | Andreas Blass | timeline score: 9 | |
| Sep 18, 2010 at 22:01 | comment | added | Andrés E. Caicedo | Nice question. By the way, I disagree with your characterization of Shelah's book as `unreadable', though it is not easy. I would be interested in what answers appear here but, as far as I know, we do not really have a good notion. A reasonable place to start, I think, is to consider $\aleph_0$-categorical theories with finite models. And take a look at the book "Finite structures with few types" by Hrushovski and Cherlin. However, the book requires a strong background in logic. | |
| Sep 18, 2010 at 21:38 | history | edited | Tim Campion | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 66 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 18, 2010 at 21:33 | history | asked | Tim Campion | CC BY-SA 2.5 |