Timeline for Canonical forms on higher degree Jet bundles similar to the Liouville form
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2021 at 3:43 | vote | accept | Nagaraj Iyengar | ||
| May 20, 2021 at 16:24 | comment | added | Ben McKay | I am sorry that I don't understand either question. The construction doesn't require a Lagrangian manifold, so it doesn't require that any obstruction vanish. I don't know what Egorov conjugation, the base diffeo, the canonical map, the closed diagram, or the pullbacks are; these terms do not appear in the paper you cite. | |
| May 20, 2021 at 3:03 | comment | added | Nagaraj Iyengar | Thanks again Prof. McKay. I request some clarifications: 1. Does your global construction take note of the 'obstruction' to the global definability via non-degenerate phase functions of a Lagrangian submanifold? (please refer Lees, J.A, Trans Am, Vol 250, pp 213-222 (1979)) 2. At the level of the Hamiltonian and via Egorov conjugation relative to a single fiber coordinate, how to compute the base diffeo whose 'associated' canonical map completes the closed diagram for vector fields via pull backs? | |
| May 11, 2021 at 9:56 | history | edited | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| May 11, 2021 at 9:34 | history | answered | Ben McKay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |