Skip to main content
typo
Source Link
burlington
  • 266
  • 1
  • 3

As seen in some contributions here, non separability of a Banach space can lead to pathology in the properties of measures or measurable functions with values therein. As an example of this phenomenon, I would mention Stegall’s result that a non-separable dual of a separable Banach space fails the Radon Nikodym property. The construcionconstruction that he used even charactises dual spaces $E’$ with RNP as those for which separable subspaces of $E$ always have separable duals. The details are in the classic text by Diestel and Uhl.

As seen in some contributions here, non separability of a Banach space can lead to pathology in the properties of measures or measurable functions with values therein. As an example of this phenomenon, I would mention Stegall’s result that a non-separable dual of a separable Banach space fails the Radon Nikodym property. The construcion that he used even charactises dual spaces $E’$ with RNP as those for which separable subspaces of $E$ always have separable duals. The details are in the classic text by Diestel and Uhl.

As seen in some contributions here, non separability of a Banach space can lead to pathology in the properties of measures or measurable functions with values therein. As an example of this phenomenon, I would mention Stegall’s result that a non-separable dual of a separable Banach space fails the Radon Nikodym property. The construction that he used even charactises dual spaces $E’$ with RNP as those for which separable subspaces of $E$ always have separable duals. The details are in the classic text by Diestel and Uhl.

Source Link
burlington
  • 266
  • 1
  • 3

As seen in some contributions here, non separability of a Banach space can lead to pathology in the properties of measures or measurable functions with values therein. As an example of this phenomenon, I would mention Stegall’s result that a non-separable dual of a separable Banach space fails the Radon Nikodym property. The construcion that he used even charactises dual spaces $E’$ with RNP as those for which separable subspaces of $E$ always have separable duals. The details are in the classic text by Diestel and Uhl.

Post Made Community Wiki by burlington