Timeline for What are those 'others' in 'the classification table of algebraic three-folds'
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2021 at 13:59 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 10, 2021 at 13:59 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 10, 2021 at 10:14 | answer | added | Nick L | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 10, 2021 at 8:31 | answer | added | abx | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 10, 2021 at 8:27 | comment | added | naf | See the paper "Rationally connected non-Fano type varieties" by Igor Krylov for such examples. | |
| May 10, 2021 at 7:27 | comment | added | Basics | Any examples that are not rational or birational to Fano threefolds? I edited the question. | |
| May 10, 2021 at 7:26 | history | edited | Basics | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| May 10, 2021 at 6:58 | comment | added | abx | Strange "classification", I wouldn't take it too seriously. Anyway, you can take a non-rational Fano threefold (e.g. a cubic threefold) and blow up whatever points or curves you like. Classification is of course impossible. | |
| May 10, 2021 at 5:59 | history | asked | Basics | CC BY-SA 4.0 |