Timeline for First use of term "Hilbert's Nullstellensatz"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2021 at 4:16 | vote | accept | KConrad | ||
| May 7, 2021 at 9:03 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
| May 7, 2021 at 6:34 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 468 characters in body
|
| May 3, 2021 at 13:10 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| May 3, 2021 at 12:25 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 88 characters in body
|
| May 3, 2021 at 8:54 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | indeed, "algebraies" and "mathematies" was an uncommon spelling even for that era; the replacement of the ending -isch by -ies was advocated in a proposed phonetic spelling reform, adopted by South Africa in 1905, but never officially adopted in Dutch. | |
| May 3, 2021 at 6:08 | comment | added | Robert Furber | If I recall correctly (my Dutch was never very good), the official Dutch for "algebraies" is now "algebraïsch", but I find a lot of Google results for "algebraïes" coming from South Africa, so presumably the old spelling is kept in Afrikaans. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 20:20 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| May 2, 2021 at 20:16 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | they are not interchangeable, the first is German and the second is Dutch; professionally the first term is used more often than the second term (see for example, the Dutch Wikipedia entry) , but if one would speak for audience of non-experts one would certainly use the second term. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 20:10 | comment | added | KConrad | In Dutch today, are the terms "Nullstellensatz" and "Nulpuntenstelling" interchangeable, or does the second term sound archaic? | |
| May 2, 2021 at 20:06 | comment | added | KConrad | The image link at the end of your post is broken. | |
| May 2, 2021 at 19:58 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |