Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
English fix
Link
Dima Pasechnik
  • 14k
  • 2
  • 34
  • 70

is every positive real cyclotomic number athe norm of a cyclotomic?

added 84 characters in body
Source Link
Dima Pasechnik
  • 14k
  • 2
  • 34
  • 70

Let $a>0$ be a real cyclotomic number. Is it always possible to solve in cyclotomics the equation $X\overline{X}=a$ ?

Equivalently, one might want to express $a$ as a sum of squares of two real cyclotomics. It is well-known that one square is not always enough.

(If two squares are not enough, then, is there an upper bound?).

Edit: $a$ is not only positive, but totally positive (otherwise the answer is No).

Let $a>0$ be a real cyclotomic number. Is it always possible to solve in cyclotomics the equation $X\overline{X}=a$ ?

Equivalently, one might want to express $a$ as a sum of squares of two real cyclotomics. It is well-known that one square is not always enough.

(If two squares are not enough, then, is there an upper bound?).

Let $a>0$ be a real cyclotomic number. Is it always possible to solve in cyclotomics the equation $X\overline{X}=a$ ?

Equivalently, one might want to express $a$ as a sum of squares of two real cyclotomics. It is well-known that one square is not always enough.

(If two squares are not enough, then, is there an upper bound?).

Edit: $a$ is not only positive, but totally positive (otherwise the answer is No).

Source Link
Dima Pasechnik
  • 14k
  • 2
  • 34
  • 70

is every positive real cyclotomic number a norm of a cyclotomic?

Let $a>0$ be a real cyclotomic number. Is it always possible to solve in cyclotomics the equation $X\overline{X}=a$ ?

Equivalently, one might want to express $a$ as a sum of squares of two real cyclotomics. It is well-known that one square is not always enough.

(If two squares are not enough, then, is there an upper bound?).