Timeline for Energy levels of double well potential
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 26, 2021 at 18:16 | vote | accept | asv | ||
Apr 26, 2021 at 7:19 | history | became hot network question | |||
Apr 26, 2021 at 4:25 | answer | added | Sascha | timeline score: 9 | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 18:02 | comment | added | asv | @MichaelEngelhardt : By non-degenerate minima I mean that the second derivatives at the minima is positive. | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 17:49 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 4 | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 15:01 | comment | added | Michael Engelhardt | I don't understand the term "nondegenerate". That usually means that there are two things that are not equal (possibly the values of $V$ at the two minima in the present context). Since $V$ is an even function, I suspect it's more likely that something is degenerate here as opposed to nondegenerate? | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 13:30 | comment | added | asv | @CarloBeenakker: I am not sure about the name of the level splitting, but the WKB method is certainly used in the proof. | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 13:22 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | I presume you mean the WKB approximation for the level splitting? | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 11:07 | comment | added | asv | Oops... Corrected. Thanks. | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 11:07 | history | edited | asv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
Apr 25, 2021 at 10:42 | comment | added | gmvh | I take it you mean $\lim_{|x|\to\infty}V(x)=+\infty$ in your definition of a double-well potential, right? | |
Apr 25, 2021 at 10:21 | history | asked | asv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |