Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 22, 2021 at 17:42 vote accept Sangrok Oh
Apr 22, 2021 at 17:41 vote accept Sangrok Oh
Apr 22, 2021 at 17:41
Apr 20, 2021 at 16:33 history became hot network question
Apr 20, 2021 at 14:59 answer added AGenevois timeline score: 7
Apr 20, 2021 at 10:52 comment added Sam Nead Ah, good catch. I decided to be bold - I edited the the question to fix the typo and I added a ref to [BDM, Theorem 9.2].
Apr 20, 2021 at 10:45 history edited Sam Nead CC BY-SA 4.0
fix mistake... add ref
Apr 20, 2021 at 10:40 history edited Sam Nead CC BY-SA 4.0
fix mistake...
Apr 20, 2021 at 9:20 comment added HJRW There appears to be a serious typo in the question, however: Behrstock, Drutu and Mosher, showed that these groups are NOT (properly) relatively hyperbolic.
Apr 20, 2021 at 9:18 comment added HJRW @DerekHolt: People sometimes talk about groups have a "proper" relatively hyperbolic structure, meaning that they are hyperbolic relative to some proper subgroup. (Of course, every group is hyperbolic relative to itself!) The question of whether $\mathrm{Aut}(F_2)$ has a proper relatively hyperbolic structure is perfectly meaningful. (As Sam Nead points out, the answer is "no".)
Apr 20, 2021 at 8:26 comment added Derek Holt Sorry to be pedantic, but I thought that groups had to be hyperbolic relative to a specified subgroup, so what does it mean to ask whether $G$ is relatively hyperbolic? Is the subgroup somehow understood?
Apr 20, 2021 at 6:33 history edited YCor
edited tags
Apr 20, 2021 at 5:56 answer added Sam Nead timeline score: 6
Apr 20, 2021 at 5:19 history edited Sam Nead CC BY-SA 4.0
formatting
Apr 20, 2021 at 4:51 history edited Sam Nead CC BY-SA 4.0
Formatting
Apr 20, 2021 at 3:16 history asked Sangrok Oh CC BY-SA 4.0