Skip to main content
added 169 characters in body
Source Link

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere 1 (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem 2), but we found almost nothing on the torus. On the sphere, typically the distance considered is the standard distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$ between the points of the sphere considered as an immersed manifold. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice). The perfect analogous of Smale's problem is obtained when the distance between points on the torus is intended in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$, but the problem looks equally interesting when considering the flat metric.

Do you know papersAre there results on this subject?

Update: Let us say that a configuration is "reticular" if its points are at the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics. A symmetry argument shows that, if a configuration is reticular, then it is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which reticular configurations (if any) are local minima?

Update n.2: I add some pictures showing numerical simulations. In the first one: the shown reticular configuration of 27 points on $\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ is numerically assessed as a local minimizer for a Coulombian repulsive potential depending on the distance in the flat metric.

In the second one it is shown a reticular configuration (again of 27 points) which is numerically assessed as NOT a local minimizer (in both cases the flat torus is represented as a square with the opposite sides identified).

1: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

2: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere 1 (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem 2), but we found almost nothing on the torus. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice).

Do you know papers on this subject?

Update: Let us say that a configuration is "reticular" if its points are at the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics. A symmetry argument shows that, if a configuration is reticular, then it is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which reticular configurations (if any) are local minima?

Update n.2: I add some pictures showing numerical simulations. In the first one: the shown reticular configuration of 27 points on $\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ is numerically assessed as a local minimizer for a Coulombian repulsive potential depending on the distance in the flat metric.

In the second one it is shown a reticular configuration (again of 27 points) which is numerically assessed as NOT a local minimizer (in both cases the flat torus is represented as a square with the opposite sides identified).

1: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

2: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere 1, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem 2, but we found almost nothing on the torus. On the sphere, typically the distance considered is the standard distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$ between the points of the sphere considered as an immersed manifold. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice). The perfect analogous of Smale's problem is obtained when the distance between points on the torus is intended in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$, but the problem looks equally interesting when considering the flat metric.

Are there results on this?

Update: Let us say that a configuration is "reticular" if its points are at the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics. A symmetry argument shows that, if a configuration is reticular, then it is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which reticular configurations (if any) are local minima?

Update n.2: I add some pictures showing numerical simulations. In the first one: the shown reticular configuration of 27 points on $\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ is numerically assessed as a local minimizer for a Coulombian repulsive potential depending on the distance in the flat metric.

In the second one it is shown a reticular configuration (again of 27 points) which is numerically assessed as NOT a local minimizer (in both cases the flat torus is represented as a square with the opposite sides identified).

1: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

2: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

Added numerical simulations
Source Link

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere [1]1 (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem [2]2), but we found almost nothing on the torus. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice).

Do you know papers on this subject?

Update: A symmetry argument showsLet us say that, a configuration is "reticular" if theits points are at the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics. A symmetry argument shows that, then theif a configuration is reticular, then it is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which of themreticular configurations (if any) are local minima?

[1]Update n.2: I add some pictures showing numerical simulations. In the first one: the shown reticular configuration of 27 points on $\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ is numerically assessed as a local minimizer for a Coulombian repulsive potential depending on the distance in the flat metric.

In the second one it is shown a reticular configuration (again of 27 points) which is numerically assessed as NOT a local minimizer (in both cases the flat torus is represented as a square with the opposite sides identified).

1: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

[2]2: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere [1] (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem [2]), but we found almost nothing on the torus. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice).

Do you know papers on this subject?

Update: A symmetry argument shows that, if the points are the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics, then the configuration is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which of them (if any) are local minima?

[1]: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

[2]: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere 1 (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem 2), but we found almost nothing on the torus. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice).

Do you know papers on this subject?

Update: Let us say that a configuration is "reticular" if its points are at the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics. A symmetry argument shows that, if a configuration is reticular, then it is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which reticular configurations (if any) are local minima?

Update n.2: I add some pictures showing numerical simulations. In the first one: the shown reticular configuration of 27 points on $\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ is numerically assessed as a local minimizer for a Coulombian repulsive potential depending on the distance in the flat metric.

In the second one it is shown a reticular configuration (again of 27 points) which is numerically assessed as NOT a local minimizer (in both cases the flat torus is represented as a square with the opposite sides identified).

1: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

2: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

added 7 characters in body
Source Link

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere [1] (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem [2]), but we found almost nothing on the torus. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice).

Do you know papers on this subject?

Update: A symmetry argument shows that, if the points are the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics, then the configuration is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which of them are (localif any) are local minima?

[1]: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

[2]: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere [1] (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem [2]), but we found almost nothing on the torus. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice).

Do you know papers on this subject?

Update: A symmetry argument shows that, if the points are the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics, then the configuration is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which of them are (local) minima?

[1]: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

[2]: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

I'm studying (with my colleagues R.Piergallini and S.Isola) configurations of points on the flat torus which minimize an attractive or repulsive potential depending on the distance, in the flat metric or in the Euclidean metric of $\mathbb{R}^4$. Two model cases are $\frac{\left(d-d_0\right)^2}{2}$, where $d_0\ge 0$, and $d^{-1}$. There is abundance of literature on similar problems on the sphere [1] (although typically using the distance in $\mathbb{R}^3$, as famously asked in Smale's 7th problem [2]), but we found almost nothing on the torus. By the way, we're interested in the case of $T^2=\mathbb{R}^2/\mathbb{Z}^2$ as well as that a flat torus generated by circles with different radii (so as to allow, if the shape ratio is suitable, the existence of a hexagonal geodesic lattice).

Do you know papers on this subject?

Update: A symmetry argument shows that, if the points are the intersections of two families of closed, parallel and uniformly spaced geodesics, then the configuration is always a critical point for any potential depending only on the pairwise distance. How to know which of them (if any) are local minima?

[1]: Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the next century. The mathematical intelligencer, 20(2), 7-15.

[2]: a survey on this is: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885064X15000205

added 307 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 109 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
edited tags
Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading