Skip to main content
added 13 characters in body
Source Link

Given a fixed enumeration of Infinite Time Turing Machines (ITTMs), let $M_i(x)$ denote a computation of an $i$-th ITTM, assuming that the input $x$ is a real (an infinite binary sequence).

Then the function $f(i)$ (input: natural number, output: countable ordinal) is defined as follows:

  1. if $M_i(x)$ does not halt for any real $x$, then $f(i) = 0$;
  2. if there exists athe largest countable ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\alpha$, but (and there does not exist a real $y \neq x$ such that $M_i(y)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = \alpha$;
  3. if both (1) and (2) are false (that is, if for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = 0$.

The ordinal $\tau$ is defined as the supremum of the infinite set $\{f(0), f(1), f(2), \ldots \}$. Question: how large is $\tau$? In particular, what is $\tau$ in comparison with the least $\Sigma_1$-stable ordinal (mentioned in the Definition 3.1 in the paper “Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe”)?

Given a fixed enumeration of Infinite Time Turing Machines (ITTMs), let $M_i(x)$ denote a computation of an $i$-th ITTM, assuming that the input $x$ is a real (an infinite binary sequence).

Then the function $f(i)$ (input: natural number, output: countable ordinal) is defined as follows:

  1. if $M_i(x)$ does not halt for any real $x$, then $f(i) = 0$;
  2. if there exists a countable ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\alpha$, but there does not exist a real $y \neq x$ such that $M_i(y)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$, then $f(i) = \alpha$;
  3. if both (1) and (2) are false (that is, if for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = 0$.

The ordinal $\tau$ is defined as the supremum of the infinite set $\{f(0), f(1), f(2), \ldots \}$. Question: how large is $\tau$? In particular, what is $\tau$ in comparison with the least $\Sigma_1$-stable ordinal (mentioned in the Definition 3.1 in the paper “Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe”)?

Given a fixed enumeration of Infinite Time Turing Machines (ITTMs), let $M_i(x)$ denote a computation of an $i$-th ITTM, assuming that the input $x$ is a real (an infinite binary sequence).

Then the function $f(i)$ (input: natural number, output: countable ordinal) is defined as follows:

  1. if $M_i(x)$ does not halt for any real $x$, then $f(i) = 0$;
  2. if there exists the largest countable ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\alpha$ (and there does not exist a real $y \neq x$ such that $M_i(y)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = \alpha$;
  3. if both (1) and (2) are false (that is, if for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = 0$.

The ordinal $\tau$ is defined as the supremum of the infinite set $\{f(0), f(1), f(2), \ldots \}$. Question: how large is $\tau$? In particular, what is $\tau$ in comparison with the least $\Sigma_1$-stable ordinal (mentioned in the Definition 3.1 in the paper “Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe”)?

edited body
Source Link

Given a fixed enumeration of Infinite Time Turing Machines (ITTMs), let $M_i(x)$ denote a computation of an $i$-th ITTM, assuming that the input $x$ is a real (an infinite binary sequence).

Then the function $f(i)$ (input: natural number, output: countable ordinal) is defined as follows:

  1. if $M_i(x)$ does not halt for any real $x$, then $f(i) = 0$;
  2. if there exists a countable ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\alpha$, but there does not exist a real $y$$y \neq x$ such that $M_i(x)$$M_i(y)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$, then $f(i) = \alpha$;
  3. if both (1) and (2) are false (that is, if for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = 0$.

The ordinal $\tau$ is defined as the supremum of the infinite set $\{f(0), f(1), f(2), \ldots \}$. Question: how large is $\tau$? In particular, what is $\tau$ in comparison with the least $\Sigma_1$-stable ordinal (mentioned in the Definition 3.1 in the paper “Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe”)?

Given a fixed enumeration of Infinite Time Turing Machines (ITTMs), let $M_i(x)$ denote a computation of an $i$-th ITTM, assuming that the input $x$ is a real (an infinite binary sequence).

Then the function $f(i)$ (input: natural number, output: countable ordinal) is defined as follows:

  1. if $M_i(x)$ does not halt for any real $x$, then $f(i) = 0$;
  2. if there exists a countable ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\alpha$, but there does not exist a real $y$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$, then $f(i) = \alpha$;
  3. if both (1) and (2) are false (that is, if for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = 0$.

The ordinal $\tau$ is defined as the supremum of the infinite set $\{f(0), f(1), f(2), \ldots \}$. Question: how large is $\tau$? In particular, what is $\tau$ in comparison with the least $\Sigma_1$-stable ordinal (mentioned in the Definition 3.1 in the paper “Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe”)?

Given a fixed enumeration of Infinite Time Turing Machines (ITTMs), let $M_i(x)$ denote a computation of an $i$-th ITTM, assuming that the input $x$ is a real (an infinite binary sequence).

Then the function $f(i)$ (input: natural number, output: countable ordinal) is defined as follows:

  1. if $M_i(x)$ does not halt for any real $x$, then $f(i) = 0$;
  2. if there exists a countable ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\alpha$, but there does not exist a real $y \neq x$ such that $M_i(y)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$, then $f(i) = \alpha$;
  3. if both (1) and (2) are false (that is, if for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = 0$.

The ordinal $\tau$ is defined as the supremum of the infinite set $\{f(0), f(1), f(2), \ldots \}$. Question: how large is $\tau$? In particular, what is $\tau$ in comparison with the least $\Sigma_1$-stable ordinal (mentioned in the Definition 3.1 in the paper “Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe”)?

Source Link

How large is the supremum of halting times of Infinite Time Turing Machines, assuming that halting times are bounded and inputs are arbitrary?

Given a fixed enumeration of Infinite Time Turing Machines (ITTMs), let $M_i(x)$ denote a computation of an $i$-th ITTM, assuming that the input $x$ is a real (an infinite binary sequence).

Then the function $f(i)$ (input: natural number, output: countable ordinal) is defined as follows:

  1. if $M_i(x)$ does not halt for any real $x$, then $f(i) = 0$;
  2. if there exists a countable ordinal $\alpha$ such that there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\alpha$, but there does not exist a real $y$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$, then $f(i) = \alpha$;
  3. if both (1) and (2) are false (that is, if for any countable ordinal $\alpha$ there exists a real $x$ such that $M_i(x)$ halts at time $\beta > \alpha$), then $f(i) = 0$.

The ordinal $\tau$ is defined as the supremum of the infinite set $\{f(0), f(1), f(2), \ldots \}$. Question: how large is $\tau$? In particular, what is $\tau$ in comparison with the least $\Sigma_1$-stable ordinal (mentioned in the Definition 3.1 in the paper “Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe”)?