Timeline for Modern proofs of the Verlinde formula?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Apr 17, 2021 at 21:44 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Apr 17, 2021 at 21:44 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Apr 9, 2021 at 21:35 | comment | added | DamienC | Would you consider the approach of Alekseev-Meinreinken-Woodward as geometric (and modern)? arxiv.org/pdf/math/0005047.pdf -- though it is for compact groups | |
S Apr 9, 2021 at 19:08 | history | bounty started | Pulcinella | ||
S Apr 9, 2021 at 19:08 | history | notice added | Pulcinella | Authoritative reference needed | |
Apr 9, 2021 at 12:40 | comment | added | naf | The proof in Beauville's paper assumes the factorisation rules: the main point there is to show why this implies the formula actually conjectured/claimed by Verlinde. | |
Apr 9, 2021 at 8:49 | history | edited | Pulcinella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Apr 7, 2021 at 16:51 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 4 | |
Apr 7, 2021 at 11:08 | history | edited | Pulcinella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 150 characters in body
|
Apr 7, 2021 at 10:26 | comment | added | ssx | I don't know what "modern" or "geometric" mean to you, but I would say the proof of Betram-Szenes (type A) is quite geometric. The main idea is that because the Verlinde dimensions are deformation-invariant and the moduli space of curves is irreducible, it suffices to prove it for a hyperelliptic curve, and then use the connection between moduli of bundles on hyperelliptic curves and Fano schemes of intersections of quadrics. The proof by Thaddeus (using stable pairs) I also geometric. | |
Apr 7, 2021 at 9:48 | comment | added | Pulcinella | P.S. There is a chance that Falting's 1994 paper A proof for the Verlinde formula just answers this, but I can't access a copy online. | |
Apr 7, 2021 at 9:47 | history | asked | Pulcinella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |