Timeline for Riesz rearrangement inequality
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2021 at 19:20 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @wanjie : So, are you satisfied with this answer? | |
| Apr 5, 2021 at 2:00 | vote | accept | W.J. | ||
| Apr 5, 2021 at 2:00 | |||||
| Apr 5, 2021 at 0:27 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @GerryMyerson : Thank you for letting me know. | |
| Apr 4, 2021 at 23:17 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | I believe OP has done that, mathoverflow.net/questions/389317/… | |
| Apr 4, 2021 at 16:17 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @wanjie : I don't have the book. Anyhow, if you have any additional questions, it is better to ask them in separate posts. | |
| Apr 4, 2021 at 15:58 | comment | added | W.J. | Thanks a lot. So without the nonnegative condition of g, if g is strictly symmetric decreasing, then whether the "=" holds if and only if f, h is a transtation of f^* and h^*?(compared to <Analysis>, Theorem 3.9, strict rearrangement inequality) | |
| Apr 4, 2021 at 15:22 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 41 characters in body
|
| Apr 4, 2021 at 15:16 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |