Timeline for Analysis from a categorical perspective
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2022 at 22:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
|
|
| Jun 28, 2022 at 3:51 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2022 at 8:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
|
|
| Aug 12, 2018 at 8:33 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | The link in the answer no longer works, but some version of the text is still available in the Internet Archive. | |
| May 28, 2016 at 19:53 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @kjetilbhalvorsen That's because Tom moved to Edinburgh. maths.ed.ac.uk/~tl/glasgowpssl should work | |
| May 28, 2016 at 11:20 | comment | added | kjetil b halvorsen | @Yemon Choi: the link in your comment is not working. | |
| Sep 15, 2010 at 8:09 | comment | added | David Corfield | For an algebraic characterisation of analysis see Peter Freyd's Real Algebraic Analysis: tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/20/10/20-10abs.html. As its publication in Theory and Applications of Categories suggests, there's category theoretic thinking going on it. | |
| Sep 15, 2010 at 7:21 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | That's fine, Paul; your answer is much more thorough than anything I'd have got round to writing. (I am rather fond of TL's note as I was in the audience at that talk and failed, to my chagrin, to guess the right answer.) | |
| Sep 15, 2010 at 4:35 | comment | added | Paul Siegel | Oops, sorry to duplicate - I spent awhile typing up my answer. | |
| Sep 15, 2010 at 3:42 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Yemon: the link seems interesting. Moreover, it seems at least as relevant to the question as a whole than my throw-away answer (I gave an example of an axiomatic characterization of an integral which is not categorical in nature; you gave one which is). Maybe you should post it as a separate answer? | |
| Sep 15, 2010 at 2:37 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Since I may sometimes give the impression of being insufficiently categorically enlightened, shall I be the one to plug the perspective in Tom Leinster's note here: maths.gla.ac.uk/~tl/glasgowpssl (I should emphasise that I don't know if one'd want to base a course on integration around this, or even use it, but I do find it an interesting point of view.) | |
| Sep 15, 2010 at 1:51 | history | answered | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |