Timeline for Computing (relative) cohomology classes on quotient (vector) space via Hodge theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2021 at 20:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 22, 2021 at 19:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 24, 2021 at 18:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 25, 2021 at 17:13 | answer | added | Igor Khavkine | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 25, 2021 at 16:37 | comment | added | EdRich | @IgorKhavkine I'm not exactly sure what you mean by compatible, but in general if $w \in W_i$ then $\mathcal{Q}(w) \in W_{i+1}$. I will put this in the question. My main difficulty lies in actually constructing $\phi_i$, if that is the correct approach. I'm not sure how to do this in principle. | |
| Mar 25, 2021 at 16:36 | history | edited | EdRich | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
| Mar 25, 2021 at 16:00 | comment | added | Igor Khavkine | Are the inclusions $W_i \subset V_i$ somehow compatible with $\mathcal{Q}$? If not, there's probably no unique way to define $\mathcal{Q}_\perp$ and you could do what you like. You should probably add the relevant information about the relation between $W_i$ and $\mathcal{Q}$ to your question. | |
| Mar 25, 2021 at 15:18 | history | edited | EdRich |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 24, 2021 at 23:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 25, 2021 at 6:21 | |||||
| Mar 24, 2021 at 23:47 | history | asked | EdRich | CC BY-SA 4.0 |