Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2021 at 0:07 answer added user178833 timeline score: 4
Apr 6, 2021 at 15:19 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 13
Mar 28, 2021 at 13:44 answer added Matt E timeline score: 5
Mar 25, 2021 at 10:10 vote accept Gabriel
Mar 25, 2021 at 4:41 comment added user166831 In context, Lang meant that there is an alternative geometric approach to abelian class field theory in the function field case, which is why he doesn't cover that case in his book.
Mar 24, 2021 at 21:59 comment added paul garrett I'd suspect that Lang meant that a heuristic for the number field case "becomes obvious" after the (etale cohomology...!) of the function-field/geometric case is understood. Lang did use hyperbole now and then. :)
Mar 24, 2021 at 10:01 comment added Gabriel @TimCampion, oddly enough, I think I have an interesting answer to your more general question. (I wrote about it in your post.)
Mar 24, 2021 at 9:59 comment added Gabriel @Faris, I unfortunately don't know how to answer your question.
Mar 24, 2021 at 6:13 comment added Tim Campion This is kind of what I had in mind when asking this question, which didn't really receive a definitive answer.
Mar 24, 2021 at 6:04 comment added Faris I'm not sure I'm interpreting this correctly but the analogy seems questionable. Wouldn't it mean that Langlands for $\mathrm{GL}_2$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ becomes obvious once Langlands for $\mathrm{GL}_2$ over function fields is established?
Mar 24, 2021 at 5:52 answer added David Benjamin Lim timeline score: 23
Mar 24, 2021 at 5:10 history became hot network question
Mar 23, 2021 at 21:28 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 18
Mar 23, 2021 at 21:12 answer added Michael Joyce timeline score: 12
Mar 23, 2021 at 21:09 history asked Gabriel CC BY-SA 4.0