Skip to main content
Added final paragraph about Sym3V and an example from the unitary case
Source Link
Jon Aycock
  • 949
  • 4
  • 14

EDIT again: I've now also done it for $\operatorname{Sym}^3V$, and it followed the same pattern. I did it (as much as I could) in the unitary case, using the representation $V \otimes V$ of the group $\operatorname{GL}_2 \times \operatorname{GL}_2$, where the first copy of $\operatorname{GL}_2$ acts on the first copy of its standard representation $V$, and the same for the second copies. Since I didn't know what to plug in for the derivatives of the inputs, I left them as $a^\prime, b^\prime$ and so on. In the end the terms paired up in a way that implies the pattern is present here as well, but it is difficult to see the actual final answer since I don't know how the coordinates vary with each $z_{ij}$. (In fact that was what I was hoping to get from this specific exercise, but the fact that I had to deal with the Lie algebra of $\operatorname{GL}_2 \times \operatorname{GL}_2$ gave enough of a wrinkle that I couldn't recover that from what I found.)

EDIT again: I've now also done it for $\operatorname{Sym}^3V$, and it followed the same pattern. I did it (as much as I could) in the unitary case, using the representation $V \otimes V$ of the group $\operatorname{GL}_2 \times \operatorname{GL}_2$, where the first copy of $\operatorname{GL}_2$ acts on the first copy of its standard representation $V$, and the same for the second copies. Since I didn't know what to plug in for the derivatives of the inputs, I left them as $a^\prime, b^\prime$ and so on. In the end the terms paired up in a way that implies the pattern is present here as well, but it is difficult to see the actual final answer since I don't know how the coordinates vary with each $z_{ij}$. (In fact that was what I was hoping to get from this specific exercise, but the fact that I had to deal with the Lie algebra of $\operatorname{GL}_2 \times \operatorname{GL}_2$ gave enough of a wrinkle that I couldn't recover that from what I found.)

Changed edit to reflect example I finished.
Source Link
Jon Aycock
  • 949
  • 4
  • 14

EDIT: Maybe I should include the fact that I know what the answer to the question in the case described aboveshould be, but I'd like to know how to determinefrom the answer in more generalitypaper I'm reading. The Lie algebra forIt writes $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$ is$\rho(s)\frac{\partial \rho(s^{-1})}{\partial z_{ij}} = \sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell j} + s_{\ell j} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ for $M_n(\mathbb{C})$$i \neq j$, with aand $\mathbb{C}$-basis$\sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ for $\{\varepsilon_{ij}\}$ where$i=j$. Here $\varepsilon_{ij}$ has$\varepsilon_{pq}$ denotes the matrix with a $1$ in its $ij$$pq$ component, and a $0$ in all others. Then it should beother components, and represents the case for $i \neq j$ that $\rho(s)\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}}\left[ \rho(s)^{-1} \right] = \sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell j} + s_{\ell j} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ (at least in terms of its actionmatrix it uses to act on $V$). IfWhen $i=j$$n=1$, it's $\sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$. Thisthis reduces for $n=1$ to $s\varepsilon \cdot$, and$sk$ as we wanted since $\varepsilon$ acts on $V$ by multiplication byas $k$. So it gives the right answer in the case I can do explicitly.

It feels like we're using $\frac{\partial Z}{\partial z_{ij}}$ is $\varepsilon_{ij} + \varepsilon_{ji}$ when $i \neq j$ and $\varepsilon_{ii}$ when $i=j$, and we're picking out these components of the matrix $\begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{11} & \dots & \varepsilon_{n1} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \varepsilon_{1n} & \dots & \varepsilon_{nn} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} s_{11} & \dots & s_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{n1} & \dots & s_{nn} \end{pmatrix}$, but I'm not sure why this would give the right answer.

My last comment for the edit: I tried to do the calculation explicitlydid an example for $n=2$ and the representation $V \otimes V$ of $\operatorname{GL}_2$, where $V$ is theits standard 2-dimensional representation of $\operatorname{GL}_2$. From this, I think I ended up with the two matricespattern may be (the matrix I get from$\rho(s)\frac{\partial \rho(s^{-1})}{\partial z_{ij}} = \sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{j\ell} + s_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{j \ell}$ for $\sum_{\ell} Y_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$$i = j$, and the matrix I get from differentiating $\rho(s^{-1})$ directly) as transposes$\sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{i\ell}$ for $i=j$. The fact that one of each otherthe indices is switched is not worrying, so I did something wrongsince $s_{ij} = s_{ji}$. Actually

This possible answer feels like picking out a component (or two components) of the matrix $$ \begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{11} & \dots & \varepsilon_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \varepsilon_{n1} & \dots & \varepsilon_{nn} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} s_{11} & \dots & s_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{n1} & \dots & s_{nn} \end{pmatrix} $$ For $i=j$, I didwe're picking out the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{11}}$$ii=jj$ component, and for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{22}}$$i\neq j$ we're summing the $ij$ component and got transposesthe $ji$ component. I'm hoping to do another example (hopefully in the unitary case, so that $s_{ij} \neq s_{ji}$), but I don't think I know enough of the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{12}}$ was just wrongLie group/Lie algebra theory to prove it even if the pattern continues.

EDIT: Maybe I should include the fact that I know the answer to the question in the case described above, but I'd like to know how to determine the answer in more generality. The Lie algebra for $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$ is $M_n(\mathbb{C})$, with a $\mathbb{C}$-basis $\{\varepsilon_{ij}\}$ where $\varepsilon_{ij}$ has a $1$ in its $ij$ component, and $0$ in all others. Then it should be the case for $i \neq j$ that $\rho(s)\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}}\left[ \rho(s)^{-1} \right] = \sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell j} + s_{\ell j} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ (at least in terms of its action on $V$). If $i=j$, it's $\sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$. This reduces for $n=1$ to $s\varepsilon \cdot$, and $\varepsilon$ acts on $V$ by multiplication by $k$. So it gives the right answer in the case I can do explicitly.

It feels like we're using $\frac{\partial Z}{\partial z_{ij}}$ is $\varepsilon_{ij} + \varepsilon_{ji}$ when $i \neq j$ and $\varepsilon_{ii}$ when $i=j$, and we're picking out these components of the matrix $\begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{11} & \dots & \varepsilon_{n1} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \varepsilon_{1n} & \dots & \varepsilon_{nn} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} s_{11} & \dots & s_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{n1} & \dots & s_{nn} \end{pmatrix}$, but I'm not sure why this would give the right answer.

My last comment for the edit: I tried to do the calculation explicitly for $n=2$ and the representation $V \otimes V$, where $V$ is the standard 2-dimensional representation of $\operatorname{GL}_2$. I think I ended up with the two matrices (the matrix I get from $\sum_{\ell} Y_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$ and the matrix I get from differentiating $\rho(s^{-1})$ directly) as transposes of each other, so I did something wrong. Actually, I did the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{11}}$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{22}}$ and got transposes, but the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{12}}$ was just wrong.

EDIT: I should include the fact that I know what the answer should be, from the paper I'm reading. It writes $\rho(s)\frac{\partial \rho(s^{-1})}{\partial z_{ij}} = \sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell j} + s_{\ell j} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ for $i \neq j$, and $\sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ for $i=j$. Here $\varepsilon_{pq}$ denotes the matrix with a $1$ in its $pq$ component and a $0$ in all other components, and represents the matrix it uses to act on $V$. When $n=1$, this reduces to $sk$ as we wanted since $\varepsilon$ acts as $k$.

I did an example for $n=2$ and the representation $V \otimes V$ of $\operatorname{GL}_2$, where $V$ is its standard representation. From this, I think the pattern may be $\rho(s)\frac{\partial \rho(s^{-1})}{\partial z_{ij}} = \sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{j\ell} + s_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{j \ell}$ for $i = j$, and $\sum_{1 \leq \ell \leq n} s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{i\ell}$ for $i=j$. The fact that one of the indices is switched is not worrying, since $s_{ij} = s_{ji}$.

This possible answer feels like picking out a component (or two components) of the matrix $$ \begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{11} & \dots & \varepsilon_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \varepsilon_{n1} & \dots & \varepsilon_{nn} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} s_{11} & \dots & s_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{n1} & \dots & s_{nn} \end{pmatrix} $$ For $i=j$, we're picking out the $ii=jj$ component, and for $i\neq j$ we're summing the $ij$ component and the $ji$ component. I'm hoping to do another example (hopefully in the unitary case, so that $s_{ij} \neq s_{ji}$), but I don't think I know enough of the Lie group/Lie algebra theory to prove it even if the pattern continues.

Added more specific result of my explicit calculation.
Source Link
Jon Aycock
  • 949
  • 4
  • 14

I'm learning about Maass--Shimura operators, and there's a term that I'm not sure how to generalize nicely.

Let $\mathfrak{h}$ be the upper half-plane with parameter $z= x + iy$, and write $s = \frac{1}{z - \overline{z}} = \frac{1}{2iy}$. For a modular form $f \colon \mathfrak{h} \to \mathbb{C}$ of weight $k$, the Maass--Shimura operator is $D_k(f) = s^k \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left[ s^{-k}f \right] = s^k \frac{\partial}{\partial z}[s^{-k}] f + s^ks^{-k}\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} = ksf + \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}$. The $k$ can be viewed as coming from the action of an element of the Lie algebra of $\mathbb{G}_m$. The $s$ pops out if you do the calculation directly, since you lose a power of $y$. This is a pretty nice, simple formula.

On the other hand, let $\mathfrak{h}_n = \{Z \in M_n(\mathbb{C}) \mid \, ^t\!\!Z = Z, Z = X + iY \text{ with }Y \text{ positive definite}\}$ and write $s = (Z - \overline{Z})^{-1}$. Fix a representation $\rho \colon \operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C}) \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$. For a Siegel modular form of genus $n$ and weight $\rho$, $f \colon \mathfrak{h}_n \to \mathbb{C}$, the Maass-Shimura operator is $D_\rho(f) = \rho(s)\operatorname{d}\left[ \rho(s^{-1})f \right]$, where $\operatorname{d}$ is the usual exterior derivative. Using the product rule, we should get a term which is $\operatorname{d}(f)$, and a term which is $\rho(s) \operatorname{d}(\rho(s^{-1}))$ times $f$. I don't know how to calculate this, at least to the point of getting a nice, simple formula like the $skf$ above.

In fact, I am interested in the directional derivative $\rho(Z - \overline{Z})^{-1}\frac{\partial \rho(Z - \overline{Z})}{\partial z_{ij}}$, where the $z_{ij}$ means the partial derivative with respect to the $ij$ entry of the matrix $Z$. It should be able to be given in terms of the action of the Lie algebra of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$.

Maybe a general formulation of the question: Let $s \colon \mathfrak{H} \to G(\mathbb{C})$ be a map from a complex manifold $\mathfrak{H}$ to the complex points of an algebraic group $G$. Then let $\rho \colon G(\mathbb{C}) \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ be a representation of $G$ on the complex vector space $V$. Let $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}} \in T_{\mathfrak{H}}(U)$ be a vector field on $\mathfrak{H}$. How do I find $\rho(s(z))\frac{\partial \rho(s(z)^{-1})}{\partial z_{ij}}$ in terms of the action of the Lie algebra?

EDIT: Maybe I should include the fact that I know the answer to the question in the case described above, but I'd like to know how to determine the answer in more generality. The Lie algebra for $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$ is $M_n(\mathbb{C})$, with a $\mathbb{C}$-basis $\{\varepsilon_{ij}\}$ where $\varepsilon_{ij}$ has a $1$ in its $ij$ component, and $0$ in all others. Then it should be the case for $i \neq j$ that $\rho(s)\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}}\left[ \rho(s)^{-1} \right] = \sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell j} + s_{\ell j} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ (at least in terms of its action on $V$). If $i=j$, it's $\sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$. This reduces for $n=1$ to $s\varepsilon \cdot$, and $\varepsilon$ acts on $V$ by multiplication by $k$. So it gives the right answer in the case I can do explicitly.

It feels like we're using $\frac{\partial Z}{\partial z_{ij}}$ is $\varepsilon_{ij} + \varepsilon_{ji}$ when $i \neq j$ and $\varepsilon_{ii}$ when $i=j$, and we're picking out these components of the matrix $\begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{11} & \dots & \varepsilon_{n1} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \varepsilon_{1n} & \dots & \varepsilon_{nn} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} s_{11} & \dots & s_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{n1} & \dots & s_{nn} \end{pmatrix}$, but I'm not sure why this would give the right answer.

My last comment for the edit: I tried to do the calculation explicitly for $n=2$ and the representation $V \otimes V$, where $V$ is the standard 2-dimensional representation of $\operatorname{GL}_2$. I think I ended up with the two matrices (the matrix I get from $\sum_{\ell} Y_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$ and the matrix I get from differentiating $\rho(s^{-1})$ directly) as transposes of each other, so I did something wrong. Actually, I did the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{11}}$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{22}}$ and got transposes, but the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{12}}$ was just wrong.

I'm learning about Maass--Shimura operators, and there's a term that I'm not sure how to generalize nicely.

Let $\mathfrak{h}$ be the upper half-plane with parameter $z= x + iy$, and write $s = \frac{1}{z - \overline{z}} = \frac{1}{2iy}$. For a modular form $f \colon \mathfrak{h} \to \mathbb{C}$ of weight $k$, the Maass--Shimura operator is $D_k(f) = s^k \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left[ s^{-k}f \right] = s^k \frac{\partial}{\partial z}[s^{-k}] f + s^ks^{-k}\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} = ksf + \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}$. The $k$ can be viewed as coming from the action of an element of the Lie algebra of $\mathbb{G}_m$. The $s$ pops out if you do the calculation directly, since you lose a power of $y$. This is a pretty nice, simple formula.

On the other hand, let $\mathfrak{h}_n = \{Z \in M_n(\mathbb{C}) \mid \, ^t\!\!Z = Z, Z = X + iY \text{ with }Y \text{ positive definite}\}$ and write $s = (Z - \overline{Z})^{-1}$. Fix a representation $\rho \colon \operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C}) \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$. For a Siegel modular form of genus $n$ and weight $\rho$, $f \colon \mathfrak{h}_n \to \mathbb{C}$, the Maass-Shimura operator is $D_\rho(f) = \rho(s)\operatorname{d}\left[ \rho(s^{-1})f \right]$, where $\operatorname{d}$ is the usual exterior derivative. Using the product rule, we should get a term which is $\operatorname{d}(f)$, and a term which is $\rho(s) \operatorname{d}(\rho(s^{-1}))$ times $f$. I don't know how to calculate this, at least to the point of getting a nice, simple formula like the $skf$ above.

In fact, I am interested in the directional derivative $\rho(Z - \overline{Z})^{-1}\frac{\partial \rho(Z - \overline{Z})}{\partial z_{ij}}$, where the $z_{ij}$ means the partial derivative with respect to the $ij$ entry of the matrix $Z$. It should be able to be given in terms of the action of the Lie algebra of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$.

Maybe a general formulation of the question: Let $s \colon \mathfrak{H} \to G(\mathbb{C})$ be a map from a complex manifold $\mathfrak{H}$ to the complex points of an algebraic group $G$. Then let $\rho \colon G(\mathbb{C}) \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ be a representation of $G$ on the complex vector space $V$. Let $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}} \in T_{\mathfrak{H}}(U)$ be a vector field on $\mathfrak{H}$. How do I find $\rho(s(z))\frac{\partial \rho(s(z)^{-1})}{\partial z_{ij}}$ in terms of the action of the Lie algebra?

EDIT: Maybe I should include the fact that I know the answer to the question in the case described above, but I'd like to know how to determine the answer in more generality. The Lie algebra for $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$ is $M_n(\mathbb{C})$, with a $\mathbb{C}$-basis $\{\varepsilon_{ij}\}$ where $\varepsilon_{ij}$ has a $1$ in its $ij$ component, and $0$ in all others. Then it should be the case for $i \neq j$ that $\rho(s)\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}}\left[ \rho(s)^{-1} \right] = \sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell j} + s_{\ell j} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ (at least in terms of its action on $V$). If $i=j$, it's $\sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$. This reduces for $n=1$ to $s\varepsilon \cdot$, and $\varepsilon$ acts on $V$ by multiplication by $k$. So it gives the right answer in the case I can do explicitly.

It feels like we're using $\frac{\partial Z}{\partial z_{ij}}$ is $\varepsilon_{ij} + \varepsilon_{ji}$ when $i \neq j$ and $\varepsilon_{ii}$ when $i=j$, and we're picking out these components of the matrix $\begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{11} & \dots & \varepsilon_{n1} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \varepsilon_{1n} & \dots & \varepsilon_{nn} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} s_{11} & \dots & s_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{n1} & \dots & s_{nn} \end{pmatrix}$, but I'm not sure why this would give the right answer.

My last comment for the edit: I tried to do the calculation explicitly for $n=2$ and the representation $V \otimes V$, where $V$ is the standard 2-dimensional representation of $\operatorname{GL}_2$. I think I ended up with the two matrices (the matrix I get from $\sum_{\ell} Y_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$ and the matrix I get from differentiating $\rho(s^{-1})$ directly) as transposes of each other, so I did something wrong.

I'm learning about Maass--Shimura operators, and there's a term that I'm not sure how to generalize nicely.

Let $\mathfrak{h}$ be the upper half-plane with parameter $z= x + iy$, and write $s = \frac{1}{z - \overline{z}} = \frac{1}{2iy}$. For a modular form $f \colon \mathfrak{h} \to \mathbb{C}$ of weight $k$, the Maass--Shimura operator is $D_k(f) = s^k \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left[ s^{-k}f \right] = s^k \frac{\partial}{\partial z}[s^{-k}] f + s^ks^{-k}\frac{\partial f}{\partial z} = ksf + \frac{\partial f}{\partial z}$. The $k$ can be viewed as coming from the action of an element of the Lie algebra of $\mathbb{G}_m$. The $s$ pops out if you do the calculation directly, since you lose a power of $y$. This is a pretty nice, simple formula.

On the other hand, let $\mathfrak{h}_n = \{Z \in M_n(\mathbb{C}) \mid \, ^t\!\!Z = Z, Z = X + iY \text{ with }Y \text{ positive definite}\}$ and write $s = (Z - \overline{Z})^{-1}$. Fix a representation $\rho \colon \operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C}) \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$. For a Siegel modular form of genus $n$ and weight $\rho$, $f \colon \mathfrak{h}_n \to \mathbb{C}$, the Maass-Shimura operator is $D_\rho(f) = \rho(s)\operatorname{d}\left[ \rho(s^{-1})f \right]$, where $\operatorname{d}$ is the usual exterior derivative. Using the product rule, we should get a term which is $\operatorname{d}(f)$, and a term which is $\rho(s) \operatorname{d}(\rho(s^{-1}))$ times $f$. I don't know how to calculate this, at least to the point of getting a nice, simple formula like the $skf$ above.

In fact, I am interested in the directional derivative $\rho(Z - \overline{Z})^{-1}\frac{\partial \rho(Z - \overline{Z})}{\partial z_{ij}}$, where the $z_{ij}$ means the partial derivative with respect to the $ij$ entry of the matrix $Z$. It should be able to be given in terms of the action of the Lie algebra of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$.

Maybe a general formulation of the question: Let $s \colon \mathfrak{H} \to G(\mathbb{C})$ be a map from a complex manifold $\mathfrak{H}$ to the complex points of an algebraic group $G$. Then let $\rho \colon G(\mathbb{C}) \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ be a representation of $G$ on the complex vector space $V$. Let $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}} \in T_{\mathfrak{H}}(U)$ be a vector field on $\mathfrak{H}$. How do I find $\rho(s(z))\frac{\partial \rho(s(z)^{-1})}{\partial z_{ij}}$ in terms of the action of the Lie algebra?

EDIT: Maybe I should include the fact that I know the answer to the question in the case described above, but I'd like to know how to determine the answer in more generality. The Lie algebra for $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$ is $M_n(\mathbb{C})$, with a $\mathbb{C}$-basis $\{\varepsilon_{ij}\}$ where $\varepsilon_{ij}$ has a $1$ in its $ij$ component, and $0$ in all others. Then it should be the case for $i \neq j$ that $\rho(s)\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{ij}}\left[ \rho(s)^{-1} \right] = \sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i} \varepsilon_{\ell j} + s_{\ell j} \varepsilon_{\ell i}$ (at least in terms of its action on $V$). If $i=j$, it's $\sum_{\ell=1}^n s_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$. This reduces for $n=1$ to $s\varepsilon \cdot$, and $\varepsilon$ acts on $V$ by multiplication by $k$. So it gives the right answer in the case I can do explicitly.

It feels like we're using $\frac{\partial Z}{\partial z_{ij}}$ is $\varepsilon_{ij} + \varepsilon_{ji}$ when $i \neq j$ and $\varepsilon_{ii}$ when $i=j$, and we're picking out these components of the matrix $\begin{pmatrix} \varepsilon_{11} & \dots & \varepsilon_{n1} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \varepsilon_{1n} & \dots & \varepsilon_{nn} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} s_{11} & \dots & s_{1n} \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ s_{n1} & \dots & s_{nn} \end{pmatrix}$, but I'm not sure why this would give the right answer.

My last comment for the edit: I tried to do the calculation explicitly for $n=2$ and the representation $V \otimes V$, where $V$ is the standard 2-dimensional representation of $\operatorname{GL}_2$. I think I ended up with the two matrices (the matrix I get from $\sum_{\ell} Y_{\ell i}\varepsilon_{\ell i}$ and the matrix I get from differentiating $\rho(s^{-1})$ directly) as transposes of each other, so I did something wrong. Actually, I did the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{11}}$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{22}}$ and got transposes, but the calculation for $\frac{\partial}{\partial z_{12}}$ was just wrong.

Added answer from the paper I've been reading. Heuristic of where I think the answer came from. Example I tried to do.
Source Link
Jon Aycock
  • 949
  • 4
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
Jon Aycock
  • 949
  • 4
  • 14
Loading