Skip to main content
added 97 characters in body
Source Link
Nandakumar R
  • 6k
  • 3
  • 7
  • 20

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to be of uniform cross section but could have mutually differently shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?

(Note: last question above is known to have "yes" answer as given in the comments below).

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to be of uniform cross section but could have mutually differently shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to be of uniform cross section but could have mutually differently shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?

(Note: last question above is known to have "yes" answer as given in the comments below).

deleted 79 characters in body
Source Link
Nandakumar R
  • 6k
  • 3
  • 7
  • 20

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to have abe of uniform cross section but different objects could but but could have mutually differentdifferently shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one arrive at some variant of the problem wherein we can have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to have a uniform cross section but different objects could but could have mutually different shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one arrive at some variant of the problem wherein we can have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to be of uniform cross section but could have mutually differently shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?
added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Nandakumar R
  • 6k
  • 3
  • 7
  • 20

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to have a uniform cross section but different objects could but could have mutually different shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one arrive at some variant of the problem wherein we can have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to have a uniform cross section but different objects could but could have mutually different shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one arrive at some variant of the problem wherein we can have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent objects that can all touch one another?

Background: The basic question as given in 'Research Problems in Discrete Geometry' By Moser, Brass and Pach (page 98) is: What is the max number of congruent infinite circular cylinders that can be arranged in 3d space so that every pair is touching? Several partial results are known including a proof by Bezdek that this number cannot exceed 24.

Questions:

  • What if we relax this question to infinite circular cylinders with not necessarily equal radii? What happens if we look at congruent and infinitely long prisms all with same cross sections (triangular, square etc..)?
  • If each infinitely long object only needs to have a uniform cross section but different objects could but could have mutually different shaped cross sections what can one say?
  • Can one arrive at some variant of the problem wherein we can have an arbitrarily large number of convex and mutually congruent solid objects that can all touch one another?
improved last question in response to comments
Source Link
Nandakumar R
  • 6k
  • 3
  • 7
  • 20
Loading
"if touching" should be "is touching", to make sense clear
Source Link
kodlu
  • 10.4k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 55
Loading
removed capitals from title, added tag
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
Loading
Source Link
Nandakumar R
  • 6k
  • 3
  • 7
  • 20
Loading