Timeline for What is known about "dimension two" vertex algebras?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021 at 20:00 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Stefan Kohl♦ | ||
| Mar 1, 2021 at 16:25 | comment | added | user1504 | One thing that happens in higher dimension is that the term 'chiral' becomes increasingly inaccurate.. | |
| Mar 1, 2021 at 15:25 | comment | added | user108998 | U might want to check out the work of Faonte, Hennion and Kapranov for the Bun_{G} case. Nb that even purely local things here are derived in nature, as the authors explain in detail (punctured d disc should be derived object for d>1, get new classes in coherent cohom in dim 2d-1). In general from conversation with one of the authors above my understanding is that not much at all is known. In the physics literature I often see what seems to be something like a two dim "real" chiral algebra, where antiholomorphic coordinates are used. I don't understand at all what is going on in this case. | |
| Mar 1, 2021 at 11:37 | history | edited | Pulcinella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 1, 2021 at 7:41 | history | asked | Pulcinella | CC BY-SA 4.0 |