Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 17, 2021 at 0:43 vote accept Matt
Feb 17, 2021 at 0:25 answer added Malkoun timeline score: 6
Feb 16, 2021 at 21:27 comment added Malkoun I misread. I will delete my comments.
Feb 16, 2021 at 17:16 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Name of reference
Feb 16, 2021 at 15:08 comment added LSpice @Malkoun, although it's not explicitly stated in the body, the title question indicates that the question is about real $T$, so the natural example you propose doesn't qualify. Indeed, if $T$ is real then $T(e_1, e_1)$ will also be real.
Feb 16, 2021 at 13:08 history edited gmvh
Added top-level tags
Feb 16, 2021 at 12:09 answer added Carlo Beenakker timeline score: 4
Feb 16, 2021 at 5:13 comment added lambda Unless I'm misunderstanding something, $M$ is only real symmetric if you've already assumed $x$ is a real vector. A complex symmetric matrix can certainly have non-real eigenvalues.
Feb 16, 2021 at 4:25 comment added Matt Thanks. Based on your example, if $T$ only has real components and is fully symmetric, then my argument with $M$ still holds and complex eigenvectors and eigenvalues are still impossible, no?
Feb 16, 2021 at 0:22 history asked Matt CC BY-SA 4.0