Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 10, 2021 at 14:26 vote accept Noel Lundström
Feb 9, 2021 at 15:51 comment added Tyrone $S^\infty$ in the CW topology is not metrisable, so certainly not homeomorphic to either a Hilbert space or a Hilbert cube. As a (weakly) contractible $\mathbb{R}^\infty$-manifold, $S^\infty$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^\infty$ (everything in CW topology).
Feb 9, 2021 at 15:39 answer added Chris Schommer-Pries timeline score: 20
Feb 9, 2021 at 12:27 comment added Jim Belk If $G$ is a countable, discrete, torsion-free group, shouldn't the left regular representation of $G$ induce a free, properly discontinuous action of $G$ on $S^\infty$?
Feb 9, 2021 at 12:06 comment added Neil Strickland @FernandoMuro I presume that here $S^\infty=\bigcup_nS^n$ rather than the whole unit sphere in a Hilbert space $H$, so I don't think that $S^\infty$ is homeomorphic to $H$. However, this $S^\infty$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^\infty=\bigcup_n\mathbb{R}^n$ and to many other spaces such as such as the Stiefel manifold $V_n\mathbb{R}^\infty$, the complement $\mathbb{R}^\infty\setminus(\text{a finite set})$, the ordered configuration space $F_n\mathbb{R}^\infty$ etc. I am not sure where to find these facts in the literature, though.
Feb 9, 2021 at 8:59 comment added Maxime Ramzi @TheoJohnson-Freyd : yes it does, in fact there's almost a converse (in "Periodic resolutions for finite groups", Swan proves that a group with periodic cohomology will act freely on a simplicial complex homotopy equivalent to a sphere). Not sure about SU(2) though
Feb 9, 2021 at 1:45 history edited Noel Lundström
edited tags
Feb 9, 2021 at 0:33 comment added Fernando Muro If I'm not mistaken, $S^\infty$ is homeomorphic to a whole Hilbert space, whose unitary group is probably huge, although contractible. Maybe if you edit the tags you can obtain better answers from people in representation theory, analysis, operator algebras, etc.
Feb 9, 2021 at 0:11 comment added Theo Johnson-Freyd @TomGoodwillie If a group acts freely on a sphere, doesn't it imply that its cohomology is periodic? And I thought that the only groups of periodic cohomology were subgroups of SU(2). Herm, maybe that's just for finite groups.
Feb 8, 2021 at 23:06 comment added Noel Lundström I know $S^7$ is not a group, but it might contain some group which is not a subgroup of $S^3$. I don't know enough about $S^7$ to exclude such a possibility. @TomGoodwillie
Feb 8, 2021 at 23:00 comment added Tom Goodwillie (1) $S^7$ is not a group. (2) Any group that can act freely on $S^n$ can also act freely on $S^\infty$. (3) I wonder about the converse. In particular, can a non-cyclic group of order act freely on $S^\infty$. (4) There are papers about which groups can act freely on (some finite-dimensional) spheres, but I don't know the state of the art.
Feb 8, 2021 at 22:53 comment added Noel Lundström I'm not quite sure I follow, what would a subgroup of $GL(n)$ be an example of? Something with a free action on $S^{\infty}$ which is not a subgroup of $S^0,...,S^7$ for big enough $n$? @PhilTosteson
Feb 8, 2021 at 22:44 comment added Phil Tosteson Often for infinite dimensional spaces homotopy equivalence often implies homeomorphism. See the discussion here: mathoverflow.net/questions/293382/… I don't understand this phenomenon well enough to confirm this, but it seems likely that many contractible infinite dimensional manifolds are homeomorphic to $S^\infty$. This would give quite a few examples: e.g. any subgroup of $GL_n$.
Feb 8, 2021 at 22:32 history edited Noel Lundström CC BY-SA 4.0
added 16 characters in body
Feb 8, 2021 at 22:23 history asked Noel Lundström CC BY-SA 4.0