Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 9, 2021 at 10:55 comment added Charlotte @user64494; I understand that but the question has to be done without numeric, it needs to be proved.
Feb 9, 2021 at 8:17 comment added user64494 @Math_Freak: Numeric mathis apart of math, like or dislike it,
Feb 9, 2021 at 2:29 comment added Charlotte @CarloBeenakker; is there any trick by which it can be proved mathematically without using any numerical computation
Feb 9, 2021 at 2:28 comment added Charlotte @user64494; thanks for your efforts, but the problem needs to be proved mathematically and not through any software like Mathematica
Feb 8, 2021 at 21:37 history edited user64494 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 108 characters in body
Feb 8, 2021 at 21:35 comment added user64494 @CarloBeenakker: Thank you. Fixed.
Feb 8, 2021 at 21:31 comment added Carlo Beenakker the matrix of the OP has $2(n-2)$ and not $2n-2$ as in your Mathematica code
Feb 8, 2021 at 21:27 comment added user64494 @CarloBeenakker: Yes, f[62605783003825957106601552641839576616084246664423713800192, 4] produces $-2.67282$ and m = 62605783003825957106601552641839576616084246664423713800192; n = 4;Eigenvalues[{{0, m - 1, 2, n - 1}, {1, m - 2, 1, n - 1}, {2, m - 1, 0, 2 n - 2}, {1, m - 1, 2, 2 n - 2}}] // N results in $\{155.857,21.113,-2.58165,-0.388454\}$.
Feb 8, 2021 at 21:08 comment added Carlo Beenakker but $-2.67282$ is greater than $-3$, so you are saying the claim of the OP is false? the value for $m$ where this sum is reached seems so astronomically large, it looks suspiciously like an issue of too little numerical accuracy
Feb 8, 2021 at 20:53 comment added user64494 For example, n = 61; m = 56; Eigenvalues[{{0, m - 1, 2, n - 1}, {1, m - 2, 1, n - 1}, {2, m - 1, 0, 2 n - 2}, {1, m - 1, 2, 2 n - 2}}] // N performs $\{155.857,21.113,-2.58165,-0.388454\}$.
Feb 8, 2021 at 20:49 history answered user64494 CC BY-SA 4.0