Timeline for How do I apply Brouwer fixed-point theorem in this claim?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 17, 2021 at 21:04 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 17, 2021 at 21:04 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 17, 2021 at 7:17 | vote | accept | Guy Fsone | ||
| Feb 18, 2021 at 11:39 | |||||
| Feb 14, 2021 at 14:18 | answer | added | Martin Väth | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 12, 2021 at 22:35 | answer | added | Guy Fsone | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2021 at 22:27 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Feb 10, 2021 at 22:22 | answer | added | Martin Väth | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Feb 9, 2021 at 19:19 | history | bounty started | Guy Fsone | ||
| S Feb 9, 2021 at 19:19 | history | notice added | Guy Fsone | Draw attention | |
| Feb 9, 2021 at 19:18 | comment | added | Guy Fsone | The main problem is to find an operator F such that the equation under consideration is equivalent to find $v_k$ such that $F(v_k)= v_k$ and on which one can apply the Brouwer fixed-point theorem | |
| Feb 8, 2021 at 14:34 | comment | added | Guy Fsone | As far I know from the mentioned paper... I don't think so..the only growth assumption are given in the first paragraph. But if you are able to tackle this with additional assumptions let me know. I am opened to any suggestion | |
| Feb 8, 2021 at 14:30 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2021 at 12:35 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 69 characters in body
|
| Feb 8, 2021 at 10:05 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Is there anything else known on $\zeta$, e.g. growth assumptions? | |
| Feb 8, 2021 at 8:57 | comment | added | Guy Fsone | @PietroMajer You are right. it is just an abuse of notation. the whole equation is projected in $\mathcal V_k$ | |
| Feb 8, 2021 at 4:07 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | How can you reduce to the last equation? Shouldn't you have the projection of $\zeta(v_k)v_k$ on ${\mathcal V}_k$ in it? | |
| Feb 7, 2021 at 22:34 | comment | added | Guy Fsone | @MartinVäth I have changed the notations.. sorry for the confusion | |
| Feb 7, 2021 at 22:18 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2021 at 22:01 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2021 at 22:00 | comment | added | Guy Fsone | @MartinVäth $v_k\cdot b_k= \sum v_{k,i}\lambda_i$ is just the standard scalar product. | |
| Feb 7, 2021 at 17:27 | comment | added | Martin Väth | Is $\varphi=\phi$ and does $\phi(v_k)$ mean the composition then? And what is the product $v_k\cdot b_k$ of a function with a vector? | |
| Feb 7, 2021 at 15:57 | history | edited | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2021 at 15:29 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Proofreading; name of article; PDF -> abs
|
| Feb 7, 2021 at 15:22 | history | asked | Guy Fsone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |