Timeline for Does $G_2(\mathbb{Z})$ depend on the choice of an integral model?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2021 at 22:42 | comment | added | LSpice | I deleted the '~' ties, which do nothing in MathJax; and, since, as @YCor observes, the reading of "for any" as "for some" is unsupported by the rest of the post, I changed it to "for every". | |
| Feb 5, 2021 at 22:41 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Deleted ~; 'any' -> 'every'
|
| S Feb 5, 2021 at 17:44 | history | suggested | gmvh |
Added top-level tag
|
|
| Feb 5, 2021 at 12:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 5, 2021 at 17:44 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2021 at 10:23 | vote | accept | user148212 | ||
| Feb 5, 2021 at 10:10 | answer | added | Jef | timeline score: 12 | |
| Feb 5, 2021 at 9:04 | comment | added | YCor | What do you mean by "for any"? do you mean "for every" or "for some" (but "for some" seems to be the claim 2 lines earlier)? If the model $\mathbb{G}'$ is $\mathbf{R}$-split, then $\mathbb{G}'(\mathbf{Z})$ is infinite (being a lattice in a noncompact Lie group, by Harish-Chandra). | |
| Feb 5, 2021 at 7:46 | history | asked | user148212 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |