Skip to main content

Timeline for What can $I\Delta_0$ prove?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Feb 10, 2021 at 2:10 history bounty ended BPP
S Feb 10, 2021 at 2:10 history notice removed BPP
Feb 9, 2021 at 19:02 vote accept BPP
Feb 9, 2021 at 3:53 comment added Erfan Khaniki They considered several theorems in mathematics including some in the combinatorics and formalized them in essentially fragments of $I\Delta_0$ or its fragments with an additional axiom which says $x^{\log x}$ is a total function.
Feb 9, 2021 at 3:50 comment added Erfan Khaniki users.math.cas.cz/~jerabek/papers/phd.pdf
Feb 9, 2021 at 3:49 comment added Erfan Khaniki The following thesis investigated the reverse mathematics of bounded arithmetic: andrew.cmu.edu/user/avigad/Students/ojakian.pdf
Feb 9, 2021 at 2:33 answer added user44143 timeline score: 10
S Feb 9, 2021 at 1:54 history bounty started BPP
S Feb 9, 2021 at 1:54 history notice added BPP Draw attention
Jan 29, 2021 at 1:09 comment added BPP I skimmed that chapter before I posted my question. All I could find was information about what kind of coding is possible for arithmetizing syntax in $I\Delta_0$, but no standard theorems about combinatorics or number theory. Did I miss something?
Jan 27, 2021 at 16:43 comment added Ali Enayat A good place to start learning about what can be done in $I\Delta_0$ is the book Metamathematics of First-Order Arithmetic by Petr Hájek and Pavel Pudlák, a free copy of which can be accessed via the link below (especially in Chapter V). Note the $I\Delta_0$ is referred to as $I\Sigma_0$ in the book. projecteuclid.org/euclid.pl/1235421926#toc
Jan 26, 2021 at 0:22 history asked BPP CC BY-SA 4.0