Timeline for Siegel--Walfisz for number fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2021 at 11:06 | vote | accept | P. Koymans | ||
| Jan 23, 2021 at 1:37 | answer | added | 2734364041 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 22, 2021 at 12:50 | comment | added | GH from MO | You are probably right, I have not thought of the ineffective Brauer-Siegel theorem (and I got too busy to check the details now). | |
| Jan 22, 2021 at 12:47 | comment | added | P. Koymans | I could be totally in the wrong here but I was hoping that (at least in my case where $[L : K]$ is bounded and $K$ is fixed) that the ineffective Brauer-Siegel theorem gives me a good lower bound for the residue, which can then be translated in a good bound on the Siegel zero. | |
| Jan 22, 2021 at 12:45 | comment | added | GH from MO | I am curious. Are you using Theorem 1.3 of Lagarias-Odlyzdo: Effective versions of the Chebotarev density theorem? If yes, do we have a better bound on the Siegel zero $\beta_0$ than what follows from (26)-(27) in Stark: Some effective cases of the Brauer-Siegel theorem? | |
| Jan 22, 2021 at 12:34 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 21, 2021 at 21:47 | history | edited | P. Koymans | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2021 at 19:54 | history | asked | P. Koymans | CC BY-SA 4.0 |