Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 20, 2021 at 22:37 comment added SSequence I guess another alternative definition for $first(r)$ could go like: "Find the smallest value $\alpha<p$ such that $a_\alpha+y=r$ (where $y \in B$). Then $first(r)=a_\alpha$."
Jan 20, 2021 at 21:44 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
added 17 characters in body
Jan 20, 2021 at 21:44 comment added SSequence Sorry for too much bumping, but I think I see the mistake made (and hence reason for downvote). The definition for first, second was too loose/incorrect.
Jan 20, 2021 at 21:39 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
added 17 characters in body
Jan 20, 2021 at 9:40 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
added 30 characters in body
Jan 20, 2021 at 9:31 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
added 613 characters in body
Jan 20, 2021 at 4:47 comment added SSequence Is there a specific reason for the downvote? What is the specific issue (or a major mistake) in this answer?
Jan 19, 2021 at 17:49 comment added SSequence It seems that instead of writing $\alpha_1=min\{\alpha \in Ord:first(f(x))=a_{\alpha} \wedge x \in \mathbb{N} \wedge x>n_0 \}$ it would probably be better to write something like: $\alpha_1=min\{\alpha \in Ord: \exists x \in \mathbb{N} (first(f(x))=a_{\alpha} \wedge x>n_0) \}$.
Jan 18, 2021 at 20:02 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
added 97 characters in body
Jan 18, 2021 at 19:40 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1778 characters in body
Jan 18, 2021 at 19:33 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1778 characters in body
Jan 18, 2021 at 19:23 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1778 characters in body
Jan 18, 2021 at 19:22 history undeleted SSequence
Jan 18, 2021 at 18:24 history deleted SSequence via Vote
Jan 18, 2021 at 18:05 history edited SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jan 18, 2021 at 17:59 history answered SSequence CC BY-SA 4.0