Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 19, 2021 at 16:09 vote accept Jeremy Rickard
Jan 19, 2021 at 14:42 history edited Jiří Rosický CC BY-SA 4.0
added 9 characters in body
Jan 18, 2021 at 16:30 comment added Jiří Rosický I have now realized that the same should work for $R$-modules over a commutative ring; see arxiv.org/pdf/1305.3458.pdf.
Jan 18, 2021 at 10:28 comment added Jiří Rosický Thanks, it is corrected.
Jan 18, 2021 at 10:27 history edited Jiří Rosický CC BY-SA 4.0
added 9 characters in body
Jan 18, 2021 at 9:39 comment added Jeremy Rickard Thanks very much for the details. I think the first sentence of the second paragraph should say "implies WVP is false" rather than "implies WVP"?
Jan 18, 2021 at 9:05 history edited Jiří Rosický CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1354 characters in body
Jan 18, 2021 at 9:00 comment added Jiří Rosický No, it works for $\bf{Ab}$ only and uses the result of A. J. Przezdziecki. I will add the argument to my answer.
Jan 17, 2021 at 12:38 comment added Jeremy Rickard Thanks again. Is it also true that WVP is sufficient to prove that $(\operatorname{Mod}R)^\text{op}$ is not boundable for any ring $R$?
Jan 17, 2021 at 10:02 comment added Jiří Rosický It seems that it depends on the double dualization on vector spaces. It would be interesting to know what happens for abelian groups. I could show that WVP (weak VP) suffices for $\bf{Ab}$ not being boundable but I do not see that it really depends on set theory.
Jan 17, 2021 at 9:27 comment added Jeremy Rickard Very interesting, thank you! Does this rely on very special properties of vector spaces, or would you expect a similar statement to be true for arbitrary module categories?
Jan 17, 2021 at 7:09 history answered Jiří Rosický CC BY-SA 4.0